Castellini John E, Faulkner Cary A, Zuo Wangda, Lorenzetti David M, Sohn Michael D
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, UCB 427, Boulder, 80309, CO, USA.
Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, UCB 428, Boulder, 80309, CO, USA.
Build Environ. 2022 Jan;207:108441. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108441. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for strategies that mitigate the risk of aerosol disease transmission in indoor environments with different ventilation strategies. It is necessary for building operators to be able to estimate and compare the relative impacts of different mitigation strategies to determine suitable strategies for a particular situation. Using a validated CFD model, this study simulates the dispersion of exhaled contaminants in a thermally stratified conference room with overhead heating. The impacts of portable air-cleaners (PACs) on the room airflow and contaminant distribution were evaluated for different PAC locations and flow rates, as well as for different room setups (socially distanced or fully occupied). To obtain a holistic view of a strategy's impacts under different release scenarios, we simultaneously model the steady-state distribution of aerosolized virus contaminants from eight distinct sources in 18 cases for a total of 144 release scenarios. The simulations show that the location of the source, the PAC settings, and the room set-up can impact the average exposure and PAC effectiveness. For this studied case, the PACs reduced the room average exposure by 31%-66% relative to the baseline case. Some occupant locations were shown to have a higher-than-average exposure, particularly those seated near the airflow outlet, and occupants closest to sources tended to see the highest exposure from said source. We found that these PACs were effective at reducing the stratification caused by overhead heating, and also identified at least one sub-optimal location for placing a PAC in this space.
新冠疫情凸显了采取策略降低不同通风策略下室内环境中气溶胶疾病传播风险的必要性。建筑运营者必须能够估算和比较不同缓解策略的相对影响,以便为特定情况确定合适的策略。本研究使用经过验证的计算流体动力学(CFD)模型,模拟了在设有顶部供暖的热分层会议室中呼出污染物的扩散情况。针对便携式空气净化器(PAC)的不同位置和流量,以及不同的房间设置(保持社交距离或满员),评估了其对室内气流和污染物分布的影响。为全面了解不同释放场景下某一策略的影响,我们同时对18种情况下来自8个不同源的气溶胶化病毒污染物的稳态分布进行建模,共144种释放场景。模拟结果表明,源的位置、PAC设置和房间设置会影响平均暴露水平和PAC的有效性。对于本研究案例,与基线情况相比,PAC使房间平均暴露水平降低了31% - 66%。一些人员位置的暴露水平高于平均水平,特别是那些坐在气流出口附近的人员,而离源最近的人员往往从该源处受到的暴露最高。我们发现这些PAC在减少顶部供暖造成的分层方面是有效的,并且还确定了在该空间放置PAC的至少一个次优位置。