研究小组和 POSNA：对 2006 年至 2020 年演讲的回顾。

Study Groups and POSNA: A Review of Podium Presentations From 2006 to 2020.

机构信息

Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Jan 1;42(1):53-58. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001995.

DOI:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001995

PMID:34723895

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Study groups are multicenter collaborations aimed at improving orthopaedic decision-making through higher-powered, more generalizable studies. New research is disseminated through peer-reviewed literature and academic meetings, including the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) annual meeting, which brings together academic and medical professionals in pediatric orthopaedics. The goal of this study was to identify patterns in podium presentations (PP) at the POSNA annual meeting resulting from multicenter study groups during a 15-year period.

METHODS

A total of 2065 PP from the 2006 to 2020 POSNA annual meetings were identified. The abstracts of each PP were reviewed to determine if they resulted from a multicenter study group and for characteristics including subspecialty focus. PP from 2006 to 2018 were further reviewed for publication in academic journals. Pearson correlation was used to assess change in the number of PP resulting from study groups overtime. Univariate analysis was used to compare characteristics of PP based on study group involvement (significance P<0.05).

RESULTS

The proportion of PP resulting from study groups increased from 2.2% (n=2) in 2006 to 9.4% in 2020 (n=16) (R2=0.519, P=0.002). Of the PP resulting from study groups, 52.9% focused on spine, 26.5% on hip, 2.9% on sports, and 2.0% on trauma. This is compared with a distribution of 16.7% (P<0.001) spine, 15.9% (P=0.005) hip, 9.5% (P=0.026) sports, and 14.6% (P<0.001) trauma focus of PP not from study groups. There was no difference in publication rate of PP resulting from study groups compared with those that were not (69.1% vs. 66.2%, P=0.621).

CONCLUSIONS

In the 15-year period from 2006 to 2020, there was a nearly 5-fold increase in the proportion of POSNA PP resulting from study groups. Spine surgery is disproportionately supported by study groups, suggesting that there is an opportunity to establish new study groups across the breadth of pediatric orthopaedics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

摘要

背景

研究小组是多中心合作，旨在通过更强大、更具普遍性的研究来提高矫形决策。新的研究通过同行评议的文献和学术会议传播，包括北美小儿矫形外科学会（POSNA）年会，该会议汇集了小儿矫形领域的学术和医疗专业人员。本研究的目的是确定在过去 15 年中，POSNA 年会上的演讲（PP）模式，这些模式是由多中心研究小组产生的。

方法

确定了 2006 年至 2020 年 POSNA 年会上的 2065 个 PP。审查每个 PP 的摘要，以确定它们是否来自多中心研究小组，并确定其专业重点等特征。进一步审查了 2006 年至 2018 年的 PP，以了解它们是否在学术期刊上发表。使用皮尔逊相关系数评估研究小组数量随时间的变化。使用单变量分析比较基于研究小组参与情况的 PP 特征（显著性 P<0.05）。

结果

来自研究小组的 PP 的比例从 2006 年的 2.2%（n=2）增加到 2020 年的 9.4%（n=16）（R2=0.519，P=0.002）。来自研究小组的 PP 中，52.9%的重点是脊柱，26.5%的重点是髋关节，2.9%的重点是运动医学，2.0%的重点是创伤。相比之下，来自研究小组的 PP 中，16.7%（P<0.001）的重点是脊柱，15.9%（P=0.005）的重点是髋关节，9.5%（P=0.026）的重点是运动医学，14.6%（P<0.001）的重点是创伤。来自研究小组的 PP 的发表率与非研究小组的发表率没有差异（69.1%对 66.2%，P=0.621）。