Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine.
Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
J Craniofac Surg. 2022 May 1;33(3):787-789. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008291. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Secondary cranioplasty is often required following trauma, infection, radiation, or oncologic care, but is complicated by soft-tissue deficits with limited regional options. Scalp tissue expanders can provide hair-bearing, vascularized tissue for tension- free closure yielding optimal aesthetic results. However, the upper limit of safe scalp expansion has not been explored. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of extended scalp tissue expansion for challenging cranioplasties in a consecutive series.
Patients who underwent scalp tissue expansion before cranioplasty were retrospectively identified from a single institution between the years 2017 and 2020. Patient demographics, tissue expansion characteristics, and complications during expansion and after cranioplasty were collected.
Six patients were identified who underwent staged scalp expansion for cranioplasty; 5 were male (83.3%) with a mean age of 43.8 ± 12.5 years. Indications for cranioplasty included 2 epilepsy- related procedures, 1 oligodendroglioma, 2 infectious processes, and 1 traumatic incident. A single expander was used in 5 cases, whereas 2 were used in the remaining case. The average expander fill volume was 434.3 ± 115 ccs with a mean expansion time of 3.3 ± 1.4 months. Expander infection occurred in 1 case and expander exposure in another, but adequate scalp expansion was still achieved in both. Successful closure over cranioplasty was obtained in 5 cases (83.3%); 1 patient ultimately required free flap reconstruction for soft-tissue coverage.
In cases of extended scalp defects, scalp tissue expansion remains the preferred method for recruiting large quantities of like tissue before implant cranioplasty.
创伤、感染、放疗或肿瘤治疗后常需行二次颅骨修复,但由于软组织缺损,局部可供选择的区域有限,手术较为复杂。头皮组织扩张器可提供毛发覆盖、血运丰富的组织,以实现无张力闭合,获得最佳美容效果。然而,头皮安全扩张的上限尚未得到探索。本研究旨在评估连续系列病例中应用扩展头皮组织扩张治疗复杂颅骨修复术的疗效。
回顾性分析 2017 年至 2020 年间单中心行头皮组织扩张后行颅骨修复术的患者。收集患者的人口统计学资料、组织扩张特征,以及扩张期和颅骨修复后的并发症。
共 6 例患者分期行头皮扩张术治疗颅骨修复术;5 例为男性(83.3%),平均年龄 43.8±12.5 岁。颅骨修复术的适应证包括 2 例癫痫相关手术、1 例少突胶质细胞瘤、2 例感染性疾病和 1 例创伤性事件。5 例患者使用单个扩张器,1 例患者使用 2 个扩张器。平均扩张器填充体积为 434.3±115cc,平均扩张时间为 3.3±1.4 个月。1 例患者发生扩张器感染,1 例患者发生扩张器外露,但在这两种情况下仍获得了足够的头皮扩张。5 例(83.3%)患者成功完成颅骨修复术后覆盖,1 例患者最终因软组织覆盖需要游离皮瓣重建。
在广泛头皮缺损的情况下,头皮组织扩张仍然是在植入颅骨修复术前募集大量相似组织的首选方法。