Ratzkowski Bruna, Koth Valesca S, Azambuja Alan A, Salum Fernanda G, de Figueiredo Maria A Z, Cherubini Karen
School of Health and Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Hospital São Lucas, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Oral Dis. 2023 Apr;29(3):1070-1079. doi: 10.1111/odi.14065. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
Both zoledronic acid, a potent bisphosphonate, and the antiangiogenic drug sunitinib are included in anticancer protocols and have also been associated with jaw osteonecrosis. Our aim was to compare the effect of these drugs on tissue repair at tooth extraction sites.
Wistar rats were allocated into four groups: (1) sunitinib; (2) sunitinib/zoledronic acid; (3) zoledronic acid; (4) control group. The animals underwent tooth extractions and maxillae were macro- and microscopically analyzed.
On macroscopic evaluation, the zoledronic acid group showed a significantly higher frequency of oral mucosal lesion; lesions in the sunitinib/zoledronic acid group were larger, albeit not significantly so. The sunitinib/zoledronic acid group had significantly less epithelium than the zoledronic acid and control group, but showed no significant difference compared to the sunitinib group. The sunitinib/zoledronic acid and zoledronic acid groups did not differ from each other, but had significantly less connective tissue and more non-vital bone and microbial colonies than sunitinib and control groups, whereas these latter two groups did not significantly differ from each other. Vital bone and inflammatory infiltrate did not significantly differ between groups.
Sunitinib alone is not associated with non-vital bone, whereas the sunitinib/zoledronic acid combination and zoledronic acid alone are.
强效双膦酸盐唑来膦酸和抗血管生成药物舒尼替尼均被纳入抗癌方案,且都与颌骨坏死有关。我们的目的是比较这些药物对拔牙部位组织修复的影响。
将Wistar大鼠分为四组:(1)舒尼替尼组;(2)舒尼替尼/唑来膦酸组;(3)唑来膦酸组;(4)对照组。对动物进行拔牙,并对其上颌骨进行宏观和微观分析。
在宏观评估中,唑来膦酸组口腔黏膜病变的发生率显著更高;舒尼替尼/唑来膦酸组的病变更大,尽管差异不显著。舒尼替尼/唑来膦酸组的上皮组织明显少于唑来膦酸组和对照组,但与舒尼替尼组相比无显著差异。舒尼替尼/唑来膦酸组和唑来膦酸组之间无差异,但与舒尼替尼组和对照组相比,其结缔组织明显更少,非活性骨和微生物菌落更多,而后两组之间无显著差异。活性骨和炎性浸润在各组之间无显著差异。
单独使用舒尼替尼与非活性骨无关,而舒尼替尼/唑来膦酸联合使用和单独使用唑来膦酸则与非活性骨有关。