Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA, 92866, USA.
Population Research Centre, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Nov;50(8):3601-3619. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02096-4. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
The current study examined the prevalence and correlates of over 50 sexual practices in a national survey of heterosexual and lesbian women in relationships. Coarsened exact matching was used to create comparable samples of heterosexual (n = 2510) and lesbian (n = 283) women on six demographic factors, including relationship length. Heterosexual and lesbian women were equally likely to be sexually satisfied (66% heterosexual women vs. 68% lesbian women). Compared to heterosexuals, lesbians were more likely to report having sex 0-1 times per month (11% vs. 23%) and were less likely to report having sex greater than once per month (89% vs. 77%). Among women who had been in relationships for longer than 5 years, heterosexual women were less likely than lesbian women to report having sex 0-1 times per month (15%; 42%). This steeper drop in sexual frequency among lesbian women than heterosexual women has pejoratively been labeled lesbian bed death. Rather than accept the label "lesbian bed death" as characterizing these sexual relationships, we turn our attention to what we call lesbian bed intimacies: the myriad ways that lesbian women incorporate behaviors promoting emotional connection, romance, and mood setting, as well as relying on a wide variety of specific sexual acts (e.g., use of sex toys) and sexual communication. Compared to heterosexual women, lesbian women were more likely to usually to always receive oral sex during sex in the past month (28%; 47%) and to use sex toys in the past year (40%; 62%). In their last sexual encounter, lesbian women were more likely to say "I love you" (67%; 80%), have sex longer than 30 min (48%; 72%), and engage in gentle kissing (80%; 92%). These intimacies likely help explain why sexual satisfaction was similar in these groups despite notable differences in sexual frequency.
本研究调查了 50 多种性行为在异性恋和女同性恋关系中的流行程度及其相关因素。采用粗糙精确匹配方法,根据关系长度等六个人口统计学因素,为异性恋(n=2510)和女同性恋(n=283)女性创建可比样本。性满意度相当(66%的异性恋女性对 68%的女同性恋女性)。与异性恋女性相比,女同性恋女性每月性行为次数为 0-1 次的可能性更高(11%比 23%),而每月性行为次数大于 1 次的可能性更低(89%比 77%)。在关系持续时间超过 5 年的女性中,与女同性恋女性相比,异性恋女性每月性行为次数为 0-1 次的可能性更低(15%;42%)。与异性恋女性相比,女同性恋女性性行为频率的急剧下降,被轻蔑地贴上了“女同性恋床死亡”的标签。我们不接受“女同性恋床死亡”这个标签来描述这些性关系,而是将注意力转向我们称之为女同性恋床亲密关系的方面:女同性恋女性采用多种行为来促进情感联系、浪漫和情绪设定,同时依赖广泛的特定性行为(例如,使用性玩具)和性沟通。与异性恋女性相比,女同性恋女性在过去一个月内,在性行为中经常(28%;47%)或总是(40%;62%)接受口交的可能性更高。在最近一次性行为中,女同性恋女性更有可能说“我爱你”(67%;80%),性行为持续时间超过 30 分钟(48%;72%),并进行温柔的亲吻(80%;92%)。这些亲密关系可能有助于解释为什么这些群体的性满意度相似,尽管性行为频率存在显著差异。