Wang Pan-Feng, Zhang Yun-Tong, Xia Yan, Zhou Pan-Yu, Wang Yang, Zhang Hong-Yue, Wang Hong-Rui, Fu Qing-Ge, Xu Shuo-Gui
Department of Emergency, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Oct 25;34(10):920-4. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.10.007.
To compare the effects of tension band combined with patellar cerclage and memory alloy patellar concentrator fixation in the treatment of comminuted fracture of the lower pole of patella.
From July 2015 to July 2019, 60 patients with distal patellar fracture were treated and were divided into two groups according to different operation methods. In group A, 30 patients were fixed with memory alloy patellar concentrator (NiTi PC), 17 males and 13 females, aged 20 to 71 (39.4±9.9) years, including 19 cases of falling injury, 9 cases of traffic injury and 2 cases of sports injury. The time from injury to operation was 10 to 75 (33.1±7.8) hours; 30 cases in group B were fixed with tension band andcerclage, 15 males and 15 females, aged 21 to 76 (38.6±10.2) years, including 17 cases of falling injury, 12 cases of traffic injury and 1 case of smashing injury. The time from injury to operation was 10 to 91 (34.5±9.1) hours. The curative effects of two groups were observed and compared.
All 60 patients were followed up for 9 to 30 months. There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding, operation time, follow-up time and fracture healing time between the two groups. Six months after operation, according to the Bostman function score of knee joint:30 cases in group A, the total score was 28.6±4.7, of which 26 cases were excellent and 4 cases were good. The total score of 30 cases in group B was 25.5±4.4, of which 20 cases were excellent, 8 cases were good and 2 cases were poor. There were significant differences in Bostman total score and curative effect evaluation between two groups (<0.05). The score of group A was significantly better than that of group B. In group B, 1 case had Kirschner wire withdrawal, 2 cases had joint stiffness and 3 cases had internal fixation irritation.
Memory alloy patellar concentrator is strong and reliable in the treatment of inferior patellar fracture. It can take early rehabilitation exercise after operation, with good recovery of joint function and range of motion and less complications.
比较张力带联合髌骨环扎与记忆合金髌骨聚髌器固定治疗髌骨下极粉碎性骨折的效果。
选取2015年7月至2019年7月收治的60例髌骨远端骨折患者,根据不同手术方法分为两组。A组30例,采用记忆合金髌骨聚髌器(NiTi PC)固定,男17例,女13例,年龄20~71(39.4±9.9)岁,其中摔伤19例,交通伤9例,运动伤2例。受伤至手术时间为10~75(33.1±7.8)小时;B组30例,采用张力带加环扎固定,男15例,女15例,年龄21~76(38.6±10.2)岁,其中摔伤17例,交通伤12例,砸伤1例。受伤至手术时间为10~91(34.5±9.1)小时。观察比较两组疗效。
60例患者均获随访9~30个月。两组术中出血量、手术时间、随访时间及骨折愈合时间比较,差异均无统计学意义。术后6个月,根据膝关节Bostman功能评分:A组30例,总分28.6±4.7,其中优26例,良4例;B组30例,总分25.5±4.4,其中优20例,良8例,差2例。两组Bostman总分及疗效评价比较,差异有统计学意义(<0.05),A组评分明显优于B组。B组有1例出现克氏针拔出,2例出现关节僵硬,3例出现内固定刺激。
记忆合金髌骨聚髌器治疗髌骨下极骨折固定牢固可靠,术后可早期进行康复锻炼,关节功能及活动度恢复良好,并发症少。