Järvinen S
Br J Orthod. 1987 Apr;14(2):95-100. doi: 10.1179/bjo.14.2.95.
The normal values of the angular radiographic cephalometric measurements in the Bergen analysis, the so called orthognathic combinations, were compared with the associations between these measurements obtained from two population samples. The original sample of the study consisted of 55 untreated orthodontic patients aged 7-14 years and with Angle's Class I malocclusion. Additional data were obtained from Solow's study on young male adults. The comparison indicated differences between the Bergen acceptable combinations and the population estimates. The Bergen norms seemed to be constructed partly on the basis of solely topographical correlations. Therefore, it can be claimed that Bergen cephalometric norms are more artificial than biological, because of which the clinical use of the Bergen analysis requires special caution.
在卑尔根分析法（即所谓的正颌组合分析法）中，将角度放射头影测量的正常值与从两个人口样本中获得的这些测量值之间的关联进行了比较。该研究的原始样本包括55名年龄在7至14岁、安氏I类错牙合的未经治疗的正畸患者。另外的数据来自索洛对年轻男性成年人的研究。比较结果表明卑尔根可接受组合与总体估计值之间存在差异。卑尔根标准似乎部分是仅基于地形相关性构建的。因此，可以认为卑尔根头影测量标准更多是人为的而非生物学的，正因为如此，卑尔根分析法的临床应用需要特别谨慎。
