• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

状态真实性的可变性预测每日的情绪和情绪调节。

Variability in state authenticity predicts daily affect and emotion regulation.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences.

出版信息

Emotion. 2022 Dec;22(8):1995-1999. doi: 10.1037/emo0001017. Epub 2021 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1037/emo0001017
PMID:34726426
Abstract

Authenticity can be defined as congruence between one's outer behavior and one's feelings or sense of self. People can experience moments of lower congruence in their day-to-day lives. refers to fluctuations over time in momentary congruence. We propose that authenticity variability is linked to lower emotional well-being (i.e., more negative affect and less positive affect) and greater need for emotion regulation. College students ( = 174) participated in an experience sampling study (4×/day for 7 days) assessing state-level authenticity, affect, and emotion regulation during social interactions. State authenticity demonstrated greater within-person than between-person variability, underscoring the importance of considering how experiences of authenticity vary across contexts rather than focusing on individual differences in authenticity. At the within-person level, heightened state authenticity was associated with lower negative affect, higher positive affect, and lower emotion regulation efforts. In contrast, authenticity variability predicted greater negative affect, lower positive affect, and greater effort to regulate emotions, as expected. The variability effects became nonsignificant, however, when controlling for mean state authenticity. Overall, these findings suggest authenticity is highly variable over time and linked to key affective processes in daily life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

真实性可以被定义为一个人的外在行为与自身感受或自我意识之间的一致性。人们在日常生活中可能会经历到低一致性的时刻。指的是瞬间一致性随时间的波动。我们提出,真实性的可变性与较低的情绪幸福感(即更多的负面情绪和更少的正面情绪)和更强的情绪调节需求有关。大学生(n=174)参与了一项体验抽样研究(每天 4 次,持续 7 天),在社交互动中评估状态层面的真实性、情绪和情绪调节。状态真实性表现出更大的个体内变异性,而不是个体间变异性,这强调了考虑真实性体验如何在不同情境下变化的重要性,而不是关注真实性的个体差异。在个体内水平上,较高的状态真实性与较低的负面情绪、较高的正面情绪和较低的情绪调节努力相关。相比之下,如预期的那样,真实性的可变性预测了更大的负面情绪、更低的正面情绪和更大的情绪调节努力。然而,当控制了平均状态真实性时,可变性效应变得不显著。总的来说,这些发现表明真实性在时间上高度可变,并与日常生活中的关键情感过程有关。

相似文献

1
Variability in state authenticity predicts daily affect and emotion regulation.状态真实性的可变性预测每日的情绪和情绪调节。
Emotion. 2022 Dec;22(8):1995-1999. doi: 10.1037/emo0001017. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
The dynamics of emotion-related impulsivity: An analysis of momentary self-efficacy and daily emotion-driven urges and actions via ecological momentary assessment.情绪相关冲动的动态变化:通过生态瞬时评估分析瞬间自我效能感和日常情绪驱动的冲动和行为。
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024 Oct;133(7):541-553. doi: 10.1037/abn0000947. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Emotionally intelligent people show more flexible regulation of emotions in daily life.情绪智力高的人在日常生活中表现出更灵活的情绪调节。
Emotion. 2022 Mar;22(2):397-402. doi: 10.1037/emo0001069. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
4
Relationships between trait emotion dysregulation and emotional experiences in daily life: an experience sampling study.特质情绪失调与日常生活中情绪体验的关系:一项经验抽样研究。
Cogn Emot. 2020 Jun;34(4):743-755. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1681364. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
5
Does interpersonal emotion regulation effort pay off?人际情绪调节努力会有回报吗?
Emotion. 2024 Mar;24(2):345-356. doi: 10.1037/emo0001289. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
6
Flexibility or instability? Emotion goal dynamics and mental health.灵活性还是不稳定性?情绪目标动态与心理健康。
Emotion. 2024 Jun;24(4):1078-1091. doi: 10.1037/emo0001318. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
7
The language of well-being: Tracking fluctuations in emotion experience through everyday speech.幸福感的语言:通过日常言语追踪情绪体验的波动。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Feb;118(2):364-387. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000244. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
8
How much variance can event intensity and emotion regulation strategies explain in momentary affect in daily life?事件强度和情绪调节策略在日常生活中的瞬间情绪中能解释多少方差?
Emotion. 2022 Dec;22(8):1969-1979. doi: 10.1037/emo0000816. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
9
Who disengages from emotion and when? An EMA study of how urgency and distress intolerance relate to daily emotion regulation.谁会脱离情绪?何时会脱离情绪?一项关于紧迫性和痛苦耐受力如何与日常情绪调节相关的 EMA 研究。
Emotion. 2023 Jun;23(4):1102-1114. doi: 10.1037/emo0001152. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
10
Negative emodiversity is associated with emotional eating in adolescents: An examination of emotion dynamics in daily life.负情绪多样性与青少年情绪化进食有关:日常生活中情绪动态的考察。
J Adolesc. 2023 Jan;95(1):115-130. doi: 10.1002/jad.12103. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Trait emotion regulation similarity and well-being.特质情绪调节的相似性与幸福感。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 6;15(1):28820. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08245-2.
2
The SAFE Model: State Authenticity as a Function of Three Types of Fit.SAFE模型:作为三种匹配类型函数的状态真实性
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Aug;51(8):1472-1489. doi: 10.1177/01461672231223597. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
3
Reciprocal relationships between self-control and self-authenticity: a two-wave study.自我控制与自我本真性之间的相互关系:一项两阶段研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1207230. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1207230. eCollection 2023.
4
Parenting Practices and Authenticity in Mothers and Fathers.父母的育儿方式与真实性
Sex Roles. 2022;87(9-10):487-497. doi: 10.1007/s11199-022-01330-0. Epub 2022 Nov 4.