Department of Linguistics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
The Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, Keio University, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8345, Japan.
Phonetica. 2021 Nov 3;78(5-6):467-513. doi: 10.1515/phon-2021-2011.
Past work investigating the lingual articulation of devoiced vowels in Tokyo Japanese has revealed optional but categorical deletion. Some devoiced vowels retained a full lingual target, just like their voiced counterparts, whereas others showed trajectories that are best modelled as targetless, i.e., linear interpolation between the surrounding vowels. The current study explored the hypothesis that this probabilistic deletion is modulated by the identity of the surrounding consonants. A new EMA experiment with an extended stimulus set replicates the core finding of Shaw, Jason & Shigeto Kawahara. 2018b. The lingual gesture of devoiced [u] in Japanese. 66. 100-119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.007 that Japanese devoiced [u] sometimes lacks a tongue body raising gesture. The current results moreover show that surrounding consonants do indeed affect the probability of tongue dorsum targetlessness. We found that deletion of devoiced vowels is affected by the place of articulation of the preceding consonant; deletion is more likely following a coronal fricative than a labial fricative. Additionally, we found that the manner combination of the flanking consonants, fricative-fricative versus fricative-stop, also has an effect, at least for some speakers; however, unlike the effect of C1 place, the direction of the manner combination effect varies across speakers with some deleting more often in fricative-stop environments and others more often in fricative-fricative environments.
过去对东京日语中去声元音的舌位研究表明,这种去声过程是可选的,但是具有类别性。一些去声元音保留了完整的舌位目标,就像它们的浊音对应音一样,而另一些则表现出无目标的轨迹,即,在周围元音之间进行线性插值。本研究探索了这样一种假设,即这种概率性的删除受到周围辅音身份的调节。一项新的 EMA 实验使用扩展的刺激集复制了 Shaw、Jason 和 Kawahara Shigeto 的核心发现。2018b. 日语中去声[u]的舌位动作。66. 100-119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2017.09.007,即日语中的去声[u]有时缺乏舌体抬高动作。目前的结果还表明,周围辅音确实会影响舌尖无目标的概率。我们发现,去声元音的删除受前一个辅音发音部位的影响;删除在紧随一个齿擦音之后比紧随一个唇擦音更有可能发生。此外,我们发现,侧翼辅音的发音方式组合,擦音-擦音与擦音-塞音,也有影响,至少对一些说话者来说是这样;然而,与 C1 位置的影响不同,发音方式组合效应的方向在说话者之间有所变化,有些说话者在擦音-塞音环境中更常删除,而有些说话者在擦音-擦音环境中更常删除。