Suppr超能文献

股骨柄选择是否会影响直接前入路全髋关节置换术的骨折类型或发生率?

Does femoral stem choice influence fracture type or incidence for direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty?

机构信息

John A Burns School of Medicine, 651 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.

Straub Medical Center, Bone and Joint Center, 888 South King Street, Honolulu, HI, 96818, USA.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3515-3521. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04236-w. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite similar fracture rates, the incidence of intraoperative and post-operative fractures between standard (ST) length and short (SH) femoral stems remains unclear. Therefore, this study compared the incidence of intraoperative and early postoperative fractures between three ST and a single tapered-wedge SH femoral stem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected on 1113 patients (1306 hips) having undergone total hip arthroplasty, via the anterior approach on a fracture table, between 2014 and 2019. One surgeon completed all ST procedures (314 hips), using one of three implants without discretion. One surgeon completed all SH procedures (992 hips), using one implant design. Differences between ST and SH groups were evaluated by independent t tests (continuous variables) and Chi-square tests (categorical variables).

RESULTS

Patients in the SH group were significantly older (p < 0.001) and had a lower body mass index (p = 0.001) compared to the ST group. The total number of fractures was 12 (3.8%) and 14 (1.4%) in the ST and SH groups, respectively. The 12 ST fractures occurred intraoperatively, compared to two (0.2%) in the SH group. The remaining seven (0.7%) SH fractures occurred post-operatively. There was no difference in fracture rate between the three ST designs (p = 0.882). Interestingly, five (0.5%) insufficiency fractures were diagnosed in the SH group.

CONCLUSION

The risk of intraoperative and post-operative fractures following anterior total hip arthroplasty may be biased toward ST and SH implants, respectively. These results, along with the presence of five insufficient fractures, identify potential fracture risks and mechanisms for specific implant designs.

摘要

简介

尽管骨折发生率相似,但标准(ST)长度和短(SH)股骨柄之间的术中及术后骨折发生率尚不清楚。因此,本研究比较了三种 ST 和一种单一锥形楔形 SH 股骨柄的术中及早期术后骨折发生率。

材料与方法

回顾性收集了 2014 年至 2019 年期间,1113 例(1306 髋)采用前侧入路骨折板行全髋关节置换术患者的数据。一名外科医生使用三种植入物中的一种,且不进行选择,完成了所有 ST 手术(314 髋)。一名外科医生使用一种植入物设计,完成了所有 SH 手术(992 髋)。通过独立 t 检验(连续变量)和卡方检验(分类变量)评估 ST 和 SH 组之间的差异。

结果

与 ST 组相比,SH 组患者年龄显著更大(p<0.001),体重指数更低(p=0.001)。ST 组和 SH 组的总骨折数分别为 12(3.8%)和 14(1.4%)。12 例 ST 骨折发生在术中,而 SH 组有 2 例(0.2%)。其余 7 例(0.7%)SH 骨折发生在术后。三种 ST 设计之间的骨折发生率无差异(p=0.882)。有趣的是,SH 组诊断出 5 例(0.5%)非创伤性骨折。

结论

前路全髋关节置换术后的术中及术后骨折风险可能分别偏向于 ST 和 SH 植入物。这些结果,加上 5 例非创伤性骨折的存在,确定了特定植入物设计的潜在骨折风险和机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验