• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者会忘记哪种膝关节置换术?单髁置换还是全膝关节置换术?

Which knee replacement do the patients forget? Unicondylar or total knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Health Sciences Ankara Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021 Sep;55(5):417-421. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.20173.

DOI:10.5152/j.aott.2021.20173
PMID:34730528
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine which type of knee arthroplasty is easier to forget by comparing levels of joint awareness evaluated with the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) after unicondylar versus total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients who underwent either unicondylar or total knee arthroplasty due to primary gonarthrosis were retrospectively identified and then divided into 2 groups: the TKA group (218 patients; mean age = 68.93 ± 7.14 years) and the UKA group (131 patients; mean age = 60.39 ± 7.03 years). The status of joint awareness after knee replacement surgery was assessed using the Turkish version of the FJS-12 at the final follow-up by telephone interview. Also, The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and The EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) scores were obtained to assess the clinical status of the patients.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 2.8 years (range = 24-49 months) in the TKA group and 3.2 years (range = 24-50 months) in the UKA group. The FJS-12 was significantly higher in the UKA group (73.60 ± 9.95) than in the TKA group (64.88 ± 9.47) (P = .001). The WOMAC score was significantly better in the UKA group (81.39 ± 9.84) than in the TKA group (74.92 ± 9.99) (P = .001). No significant difference in EQ-5D existed between the groups (0.76 ± 0.14 for the TKA group, 0.79 ± 0.17 for the UKA group; P = .441). In terms of gender, the FJS-12 showed no differences between the groups; however, more favorable scores were recorded in younger patients with UKA.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study have demonstrated that UKA may be better than TKA in terms of the patient perception of pain, stiffness, and physical functioning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过比较单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)后关节意识评分(FJS-12)来确定哪种类型的膝关节置换术更容易被遗忘。

方法

回顾性地确定了因原发性膝骨关节炎而接受 UKA 或 TKA 的患者,并将其分为 2 组:TKA 组(218 例;平均年龄=68.93±7.14 岁)和 UKA 组(131 例;平均年龄=60.39±7.03 岁)。通过电话访谈在最终随访时使用土耳其语版 FJS-12 评估膝关节置换术后关节意识状况。还获得了西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)评分,以评估患者的临床状况。

结果

TKA 组的平均随访时间为 2.8 年(范围=24-49 个月),UKA 组为 3.2 年(范围=24-50 个月)。FJS-12 在 UKA 组(73.60±9.95)显著高于 TKA 组(64.88±9.47)(P=.001)。WOMAC 评分在 UKA 组(81.39±9.84)显著优于 TKA 组(74.92±9.99)(P=.001)。两组之间 EQ-5D 无显著差异(TKA 组为 0.76±0.14,UKA 组为 0.79±0.17;P=.441)。就性别而言,FJS-12 在两组之间无差异;然而,在接受 UKA 的年轻患者中记录到了更有利的评分。

结论

本研究结果表明,在患者对疼痛、僵硬和身体功能的感知方面,UKA 可能优于 TKA。

证据水平

IV 级,治疗性研究。

相似文献

1
Which knee replacement do the patients forget? Unicondylar or total knee arthroplasty.患者会忘记哪种膝关节置换术?单髁置换还是全膝关节置换术?
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2021 Sep;55(5):417-421. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.20173.
2
Forgotten Joint Score: Comparison between total and unicondylar knee arthroplasty.遗忘关节评分:全膝关节置换术与单髁膝关节置换术的比较
Knee. 2021 Mar;29:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.01.009. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
3
[Comparison of the effectiveness of unicompartmental arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty based on patient scale data].基于患者规模数据的单髁关节置换术与全膝关节置换术疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 15;35(12):1574-1579. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202108115.
4
Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术患者报告结局的差异:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1453-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.034. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
5
Knee Scores of Patients with Non-Lateral Compartmental Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Mobile, Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Randomized Controlled Trial.膝关节外侧间室骨关节炎患者行活动平台、固定平台单髁膝关节置换术和全膝关节置换术的膝关节评分:一项随机对照试验。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Jan;14(1):73-87. doi: 10.1111/os.13111. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
6
Joint awareness after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.单髁膝关节置换术和全膝关节置换术后关节联合感知:队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Oct;29(10):3478-3487. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06327-4. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget?单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术:患者更容易遗忘哪种人工关节?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):681-686. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3868-1. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
8
The clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty is compromised by a previously implanted medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty.先前植入的内侧单髁膝关节置换会影响全膝关节置换的临床效果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4331-4337. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04829-7. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
9
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the Italian version of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 is valid and reliable to assess prosthesis awareness.单髁膝关节置换术:意大利版遗忘关节评分-12在评估假体认知方面有效且可靠。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Apr;30(4):1250-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06559-y. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
10
Comparison of joint awareness after total knee arthroplasty, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective study.全膝关节置换术、单髁膝关节置换术和胫骨高位截骨术后关节认知度的比较:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 24;24(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06779-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Offers More Natural Feeling Joints Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与全膝关节置换术相比,单髁膝关节置换术可提供更自然的关节感受:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JB JS Open Access. 2025 May 8;10(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00011. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
Return to sport after total knee arthroplasty: an Australian perspective.全膝关节置换术后重返运动:澳大利亚视角
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 11;145(1):236. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05843-7.
3
Comparison of joint awareness after total knee arthroplasty, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective study.
全膝关节置换术、单髁膝关节置换术和胫骨高位截骨术后关节认知度的比较:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Aug 24;24(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06779-y.
4
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Inversed Restricted Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty by Asia Specific (Huang's) Phenotypes, a Prospective Pilot Study.基于亚洲特定(黄氏)表型的反向受限运动学对线全膝关节置换术的临床和影像学结果:一项前瞻性初步研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 8;12(6):2110. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062110.
5
Exploring the relationship between bearing extrusion and postoperative persistent pain in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A trajectory measurement study.探索牛津单髁膝关节置换术中承重挤压与术后持续性疼痛之间的关系:一项轨迹测量研究。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 29;10:965009. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.965009. eCollection 2022.