Göksel Bengi, Dokuz Eylul University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Narlıdere, 35000 İzmir, Turkey,
Croat Med J. 2021 Oct 31;62(5):435-445. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2021.62.435.
To determine which flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) channel best visualizes colon mucosa in ulcerative colitis (UC) and to compare FICE imaging with standard imaging.
The study enrolled patients with ulcerative colitis in remission who had inflammatory bowel disease for at least 8 years. All patients underwent screening colonoscopy. The entire colon, especially the suspicious areas in terms of dysplasia, were imaged with standard endoscopy and FICE. Random and target biopsies were obtained. Histopathological diagnosis was made and image patterns were evaluated. Seven endoscopists evaluated normal, colitis, and polyp images obtained with FICE.
One hundred and twenty-three colon segments were evaluated and 1831 images were obtained from 18 patients. A total of 1652 images were FICE and 179 were standard images. Separate FICE images were obtained for normal colon mucosa, polypoid lesions, and colitis areas. Normal colon mucosa was best visualized using the second, sixth, and ninth FICE channel; polyps using the third, seventh, and ninth channel; and colitis using the second, third, and ninth channel. When all images were analyzed, the second and ninth channel were significantly better than the other channels. A total of 584 biopsies were obtained, including 492 (84.2%) random biopsies and 92 (15.7%) target biopsies. Random biopsies detected no dysplasia, but target biopsies detected low-grade dysplasia in three diminutive polyps.
FICE was not significantly better at dysplasia screening than the standard procedure, but it effectively detected diminutive polyps and evaluated surface patterns without using magnification. FICE might contribute to the assessment of inflammation severity in patients with UC in clinical remission. However, more extensive studies are necessary to confirm these findings.
确定哪种灵活光谱成像彩色增强(FICE)通道最能观察溃疡性结肠炎(UC)中的结肠黏膜,并比较 FICE 成像与标准成像。
该研究纳入了缓解期溃疡性结肠炎患者,这些患者患有炎症性肠病至少 8 年。所有患者均接受筛查性结肠镜检查。整个结肠,特别是在增生方面有可疑的区域,均采用标准内镜和 FICE 进行成像。随机和目标活检均获得。进行组织病理学诊断并评估图像模式。7 名内镜医生评估了 FICE 获得的正常、结肠炎和息肉图像。
共评估了 123 个结肠段,18 例患者获得了 1831 个图像。共获得 1652 个 FICE 图像和 179 个标准图像。分别获得了正常结肠黏膜、息肉样病变和结肠炎区域的单独 FICE 图像。正常结肠黏膜最好使用第二、六、九通道 FICE 观察;息肉使用第三、七、九通道;结肠炎使用第二、三、九通道。当分析所有图像时,第二和第九通道明显优于其他通道。共获得 584 个活检,包括 492 个(84.2%)随机活检和 92 个(15.7%)目标活检。随机活检未发现不典型增生,但目标活检在 3 个微小息肉中发现了低级别不典型增生。
FICE 在增生筛查方面并不优于标准程序,但它可以有效地检测微小息肉并在不使用放大的情况下评估表面模式。FICE 可能有助于评估处于临床缓解期的 UC 患者的炎症严重程度。然而,需要进行更广泛的研究来证实这些发现。