Suppr超能文献

群组会话治疗对失语症独白话语影响的随机对照试验。

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Group Conversation Treatment on Monologic Discourse in Aphasia.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4861-4875. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00023. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Evidence has shown that group conversation treatment may improve communication and reduce social isolation for people with aphasia. However, little is known about the impact of conversation group treatment on measures of discourse. This project explored the impact of conversation treatment on measures of monologic discourse.

METHOD

In this randomized controlled trial, 48 participants with chronic aphasia were randomly assigned to dyadic, large group, or control conditions. Conversation group treatment was provided for 1 hr, twice per week, for 10 weeks. Discourse samples were collected and coded at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 6-week maintenance. There were three narrative tasks: (a) Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) picture description, (b) Cat Rescue Picture, and (c) Cinderella retell. All narratives were coded using the percent correct information units (percent CIUs), the CAT standardized narrative analysis method, and the complete utterance (CU) method.

RESULTS

No significant changes were observed on percent CIU, which was the primary outcome measure. The treated groups demonstrated improvement on aspects of the CU method following treatment, whereas the control group did not. Significant changes were observed for other CIU measures and the CAT standardized narrative analysis in both the treated and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the CU measures were more sensitive to the effects of conversation treatment in monologic discourse compared to CIU and CAT measures. Changes were more common in absolute rather than relative values, suggesting that conversation treatment impacts the overall amount of language produced rather than efficiency of production.

摘要

目的

有证据表明,小组对话治疗可能会改善失语症患者的沟通能力并减少社交孤立感。然而,对于对话组治疗对话语测量的影响知之甚少。本项目探讨了对话治疗对独白话语测量的影响。

方法

在这项随机对照试验中,将 48 名慢性失语症患者随机分配到双人、大组和对照组。对话组治疗每周进行两次,每次 1 小时,共进行 10 周。在治疗前、治疗后和 6 周维持期收集并编码话语样本。有三项叙述任务:(a)全面失语症测试(CAT)图片描述、(b)Cat Rescue 图片和(c)灰姑娘复述。所有叙述均采用正确信息单位百分比(percent CIUs)、CAT 标准化叙述分析方法和完整话语(CU)方法进行编码。

结果

主要结局测量指标的 CIU 百分比没有显著变化。治疗组在治疗后 CU 方法的各个方面均有所改善,而对照组则没有。治疗组和对照组的其他 CIU 测量值和 CAT 标准化叙述分析均有显著变化。

结论

结果表明,与 CIU 和 CAT 测量值相比,CU 测量值对对话治疗在独白话语中的影响更为敏感。变化更常见于绝对值而非相对值,这表明对话治疗会影响语言产出的整体量,而不是产出效率。

相似文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Group Conversation Treatment on Monologic Discourse in Aphasia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4861-4875. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00023. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
4
Pilot Results for ECoLoGiC-Tx: A New Conversation-Level Intervention Improving Language in People With Moderate to Severe Aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Jan 3;33(1):153-172. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00141. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
6
Efficacy of Aphasia Group Conversation Treatment via Telepractice on Language and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2565-2579. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00306. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
8
Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: can gains in picture naming generalize to connected speech?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Nov-Dec;44(6):1036-62. doi: 10.1080/13682820802585975.
9
Co-constructed communication therapy for individuals with acquired brain injury: A systematic review.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):496-518. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12841. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
10
Revisiting the Correct Information Unit: Measuring Informativeness in Unstructured Conversations in People With Aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1099-1114. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0268. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive intervention combining group and personalized language therapy in primary progressive aphasia: Quantitative and qualitative findings.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Jul 22;11(3):e70132. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70132. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
3
Core lexicon in aphasia: A longitudinal study.
Aphasiology. 2023;37(10):1679-1691. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2121598. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
4
Efficacy of Aphasia Group Conversation Treatment via Telepractice on Language and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2565-2579. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00306. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 May;55(3):417-442. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12528. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
An Exploration of the Impact of Group Treatment for Aphasia on Connected Speech.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Jan;26(1):72-85. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719001012.
3
Choosing Discourse Outcome Measures to Assess Clinical Change.
Semin Speech Lang. 2020 Jan;41(1):1-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401029. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Revisiting the Correct Information Unit: Measuring Informativeness in Unstructured Conversations in People With Aphasia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1099-1114. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0268. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
7
Neuroplasticity of Language Networks in Aphasia: Advances, Updates, and Future Challenges.
Front Neurol. 2019 Apr 2;10:295. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00295. eCollection 2019.
8
A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.109. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
9
The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Implications for Improvements in Research Design, Reporting, Replication, and Synthesis.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.112. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):689-732. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12318. Epub 2017 May 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验