• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群组会话治疗对失语症独白话语影响的随机对照试验。

A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Group Conversation Treatment on Monologic Discourse in Aphasia.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.

Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4861-4875. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00023. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00023
PMID:34731574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10110355/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Evidence has shown that group conversation treatment may improve communication and reduce social isolation for people with aphasia. However, little is known about the impact of conversation group treatment on measures of discourse. This project explored the impact of conversation treatment on measures of monologic discourse.

METHOD

In this randomized controlled trial, 48 participants with chronic aphasia were randomly assigned to dyadic, large group, or control conditions. Conversation group treatment was provided for 1 hr, twice per week, for 10 weeks. Discourse samples were collected and coded at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 6-week maintenance. There were three narrative tasks: (a) Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) picture description, (b) Cat Rescue Picture, and (c) Cinderella retell. All narratives were coded using the percent correct information units (percent CIUs), the CAT standardized narrative analysis method, and the complete utterance (CU) method.

RESULTS

No significant changes were observed on percent CIU, which was the primary outcome measure. The treated groups demonstrated improvement on aspects of the CU method following treatment, whereas the control group did not. Significant changes were observed for other CIU measures and the CAT standardized narrative analysis in both the treated and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the CU measures were more sensitive to the effects of conversation treatment in monologic discourse compared to CIU and CAT measures. Changes were more common in absolute rather than relative values, suggesting that conversation treatment impacts the overall amount of language produced rather than efficiency of production.

摘要

目的

有证据表明,小组对话治疗可能会改善失语症患者的沟通能力并减少社交孤立感。然而,对于对话组治疗对话语测量的影响知之甚少。本项目探讨了对话治疗对独白话语测量的影响。

方法

在这项随机对照试验中,将 48 名慢性失语症患者随机分配到双人、大组和对照组。对话组治疗每周进行两次,每次 1 小时,共进行 10 周。在治疗前、治疗后和 6 周维持期收集并编码话语样本。有三项叙述任务:(a)全面失语症测试(CAT)图片描述、(b)Cat Rescue 图片和(c)灰姑娘复述。所有叙述均采用正确信息单位百分比(percent CIUs)、CAT 标准化叙述分析方法和完整话语(CU)方法进行编码。

结果

主要结局测量指标的 CIU 百分比没有显著变化。治疗组在治疗后 CU 方法的各个方面均有所改善,而对照组则没有。治疗组和对照组的其他 CIU 测量值和 CAT 标准化叙述分析均有显著变化。

结论

结果表明,与 CIU 和 CAT 测量值相比,CU 测量值对对话治疗在独白话语中的影响更为敏感。变化更常见于绝对值而非相对值,这表明对话治疗会影响语言产出的整体量,而不是产出效率。

相似文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Group Conversation Treatment on Monologic Discourse in Aphasia.群组会话治疗对失语症独白话语影响的随机对照试验。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Dec 13;64(12):4861-4875. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00023. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
2
Two to Tango or the More the Merrier? A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Group Size in Aphasia Conversation Treatment on Standardized Tests.两人探戈或多多益善?随机对照试验研究在失语症对话治疗中小组规模对标准化测试的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 May 21;62(5):1437-1451. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0404.
3
The Benefits of Conversation Group Treatment for Individuals With Chronic Aphasia: Updated Evidence From a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial on Measures of Language and Communication.对话小组治疗对慢性失语症患者的益处:一项关于语言和沟通测量的多中心随机对照试验的最新证据
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 May 6;34(3):1203-1218. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00279. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
4
Pilot Results for ECoLoGiC-Tx: A New Conversation-Level Intervention Improving Language in People With Moderate to Severe Aphasia.ECoLoGiC-Tx 的初步研究结果:一种新的对话层面的干预措施,可改善中重度失语症患者的语言能力。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2024 Jan 3;33(1):153-172. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-23-00141. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
5
Assessing Language in Unstructured Conversation in People With Aphasia: Methods, Psychometric Integrity, Normative Data, and Comparison to a Structured Narrative Task.评估失语症患者非结构化对话中的语言:方法、心理计量学完整性、常模数据以及与结构化叙事任务的比较。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Nov 8;64(11):4344-4365. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00641. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
6
Efficacy of Aphasia Group Conversation Treatment via Telepractice on Language and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.远程实践失语症团体对话治疗对语言和患者报告结局测量的疗效。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2565-2579. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00306. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
7
Computerised speech and language therapy or attention control added to usual care for people with long-term post-stroke aphasia: the Big CACTUS three-arm RCT.计算机化言语和语言治疗或注意力控制联合常规护理用于长期卒中后失语症患者:大 CACTUS 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Apr;24(19):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24190.
8
Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: can gains in picture naming generalize to connected speech?命名疗法对失语症患者词汇生成能力的改善:图片命名的改善能否推广到连续言语?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2009 Nov-Dec;44(6):1036-62. doi: 10.1080/13682820802585975.
9
Co-constructed communication therapy for individuals with acquired brain injury: A systematic review.协同构建的沟通疗法治疗后天性脑损伤:系统综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Mar-Apr;59(2):496-518. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12841. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
10
Revisiting the Correct Information Unit: Measuring Informativeness in Unstructured Conversations in People With Aphasia.重新审视正确的信息单位:衡量失语症患者非结构化对话中的信息量。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1099-1114. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0268. Epub 2019 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive intervention combining group and personalized language therapy in primary progressive aphasia: Quantitative and qualitative findings.原发性进行性失语综合干预联合小组及个性化语言治疗:定量与定性研究结果
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025 Jul 22;11(3):e70132. doi: 10.1002/trc2.70132. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
The Benefits of Conversation Group Treatment for Individuals With Chronic Aphasia: Updated Evidence From a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial on Measures of Language and Communication.对话小组治疗对慢性失语症患者的益处:一项关于语言和沟通测量的多中心随机对照试验的最新证据
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 May 6;34(3):1203-1218. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00279. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
3
Core lexicon in aphasia: A longitudinal study.失语症的核心词汇:一项纵向研究。
Aphasiology. 2023;37(10):1679-1691. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2121598. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
4
Efficacy of Aphasia Group Conversation Treatment via Telepractice on Language and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.远程实践失语症团体对话治疗对语言和患者报告结局测量的疗效。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Oct 17;32(5S):2565-2579. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00306. Epub 2023 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation.英国言语治疗师在失语症康复中对话语分析的看法和报告的实践。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020 May;55(3):417-442. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12528. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
An Exploration of the Impact of Group Treatment for Aphasia on Connected Speech.失语症群体治疗对连贯性口语影响的探索。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Jan;26(1):72-85. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719001012.
3
Choosing Discourse Outcome Measures to Assess Clinical Change.选择话语结果测量指标来评估临床变化。
Semin Speech Lang. 2020 Jan;41(1):1-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401029. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Revisiting the Correct Information Unit: Measuring Informativeness in Unstructured Conversations in People With Aphasia.重新审视正确的信息单位:衡量失语症患者非结构化对话中的信息量。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Aug 9;28(3):1099-1114. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0268. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
5
Two to Tango or the More the Merrier? A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Group Size in Aphasia Conversation Treatment on Standardized Tests.两人探戈或多多益善?随机对照试验研究在失语症对话治疗中小组规模对标准化测试的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 May 21;62(5):1437-1451. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0404.
6
Conversation in Aphasia Across Communication Partners: Exploring Stability of Microlinguistic Measures and Communicative Success.失语症患者交流双方间的对话:探索微观语言测量指标和交流成功的稳定性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Mar 11;28(1S):359-372. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0148.
7
Neuroplasticity of Language Networks in Aphasia: Advances, Updates, and Future Challenges.失语症中语言网络的神经可塑性:进展、更新与未来挑战
Front Neurol. 2019 Apr 2;10:295. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00295. eCollection 2019.
8
A Theory-Driven System for the Specification of Rehabilitation Treatments.一种基于理论的康复治疗规范系统。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.109. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
9
The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Implications for Improvements in Research Design, Reporting, Replication, and Synthesis.康复治疗规范系统:对研究设计、报告、复制和综合改进的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jan;100(1):146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.09.112. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
10
Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia.失语症中话语信息测量质量的综述。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Nov;52(6):689-732. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12318. Epub 2017 May 31.