Suppr超能文献

电穿孔作为针对不同靶点的抗生素的疗效增强剂

Electroporation as an Efficacy Potentiator for Antibiotics With Different Target Sites.

作者信息

Lovšin Žana, Klančnik Anja, Kotnik Tadej

机构信息

Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2021 Oct 18;12:722232. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.722232. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is a global health threat, and there is ample motivation for development of novel antibacterial approaches combining multiple strategies. Electroporation is among the promising complementary techniques - highly optimizable, effective against a broad range of bacteria, and largely impervious to development of resistance. To date, most studies investigating electroporation as an efficacy potentiator for antibacterials used substances permissible in food industry, and only few used clinical antibiotics, as acceptable applications are largely limited to treatment of wastewaters inherently contaminated with such antibiotics. Moreover, most studies have focused mainly on maximal achievable effect, and less on underlying mechanisms. Here, we compare inactivation potentiation rates for three antibiotics with different modes of action: ampicillin (inhibits cell wall synthesis), ciprofloxacin (inhibits DNA replication), and tetracycline (inhibits protein synthesis). We used concentrations for each antibiotic from 0 to 30× its minimum inhibitory concentration, a single 1-ms electric pulse with amplitude from 0 to 20 kV/cm, and post-pulse pre-dilution incubation either absent (≲1 min) or lasting 60 min, 160 min, or 24 h. Our data show that with incubation, potentiation is significant for all three antibiotics, increases consistently with pulse amplitude, and generally also with antibiotic concentration and incubation time. With incubation, potentiation for ampicillin was rather consistently (although with weak statistical significance) superior to both ciprofloxacin and tetracycline: ampicillin was superior to both in 42 of 48 data points, including 7 with significance with respect to both, while at 60- and 160-min incubation, it was superior in 31 of 32 data points, including 6 with significance with respect to both. This suggests that electroporation potentiates wall-targeting antibiotics more than those with intracellular targets, providing motivation for in-depth studies of the relationship between the mode of action of an antibiotic and its potentiation by electroporation. Identification of substances permissible in foods and targeting the cell wall of both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria might provide candidate antibacterials for broad and strong potentiation by electroporation applicable also for food preservation.

摘要

抗生素耐药性是对全球健康的一大威胁,因此开发结合多种策略的新型抗菌方法具有充分的动机。电穿孔是一种很有前景的辅助技术——高度可优化、对多种细菌有效,且基本上不会产生耐药性。迄今为止,大多数将电穿孔作为抗菌增效剂的研究使用的是食品工业中允许使用的物质,只有少数研究使用了临床抗生素,因为可接受的应用主要限于处理天然受此类抗生素污染的废水。此外,大多数研究主要集中在可达到的最大效果上,而对潜在机制的关注较少。在这里,我们比较了三种具有不同作用模式的抗生素的失活增强率:氨苄青霉素(抑制细胞壁合成)、环丙沙星(抑制DNA复制)和四环素(抑制蛋白质合成)。我们使用了每种抗生素从0到其最低抑菌浓度30倍的浓度,单个1毫秒的电脉冲,幅度从0到20 kV/cm,脉冲后预稀释孵育时间要么不存在(≲1分钟),要么持续60分钟、160分钟或24小时。我们的数据表明,经过孵育后,这三种抗生素的增效作用都很显著,随脉冲幅度持续增加,一般也随抗生素浓度和孵育时间增加。经过孵育后,氨苄青霉素的增效作用相当一致(尽管统计学意义较弱)地优于环丙沙星和四环素:在48个数据点中的42个中,氨苄青霉素优于两者,其中7个在两者方面都具有显著性,而在孵育60分钟和160分钟时,在32个数据点中的31个中它优于两者,其中6个在两者方面都具有显著性。这表明电穿孔对靶向细胞壁的抗生素的增效作用比对具有细胞内靶点的抗生素更强,这为深入研究抗生素的作用模式与其通过电穿孔的增效作用之间的关系提供了动力。鉴定食品中允许使用的物质并靶向革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌的细胞壁,可能会提供可通过电穿孔实现广泛而强效增效作用且也适用于食品保鲜的候选抗菌剂。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5950/8558673/f1e27c33e9fb/fmicb-12-722232-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验