Arshad Mahnaz, Ghanavati Zahra, Aminishakib Pouyan, Rasouli Kamran, Shirani Gholamreza
Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran Iran.
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, International Campus, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
J Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Apr 21;12:e16. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.16. eCollection 2021.
Phototherapy with a light-emitting diode (LED) is used in medicine due to its potential bio-stimulatory effects on the human body. However, controversy still exists regarding the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and phototherapy with LED. This in vivo study aimed to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the newly formed bone following LED phototherapy of the human maxillary sinuses. This randomized clinical trial (concurrent parallel) was conducted on 44 patients in two groups (n=22) at the Implant Department of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Randomization was done by a random sequence generator program. The inclusion criteria were absence of chronic sinusitis and chronic bone marrow conditions, no history of surgery at the site, absence of diabetes mellitus, no history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, maxillary premolar edentulism, and signing informed consent forms. Group A underwent LED phototherapy with 620 ± 2 nm wavelength for 20 minutes daily for a total of 21 days after sinus lift surgery. Group B served as the control group and did not receive phototherapy. After 6 months, the grafted sites were re-opened for implant placement, and bone biopsy samples were obtained using a trephine bur. The samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and inspected under a light microscope. The results were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Both the surgeon and pathologist were blinded to the group allocation of patients. Forty tissue specimens were analyzed. Insignificant differences existed between the two groups in terms of the degree of inflammation, bone quality, and maturity of collagen. Histological analyses revealed no significant difference in the mineralized areas of bone between the two groups ( >0.05). The results indicated that LED phototherapy cannot significantly enhance osteogenesis after sinus lift surgery. No side effects were observed in the experimental group.
由于发光二极管(LED)光疗对人体具有潜在的生物刺激作用,因此在医学中得到应用。然而,关于低强度激光疗法(LLLT)和LED光疗的疗效仍存在争议。这项体内研究旨在定量和定性评估人类上颌窦经LED光疗后新形成的骨组织。这项随机临床试验(同期平行)在德黑兰医科大学种植科对44例患者进行了两组(n = 22)研究。随机化通过随机序列生成程序完成。纳入标准为无慢性鼻窦炎和慢性骨髓疾病,该部位无手术史,无糖尿病,无化疗或放疗史,上颌前磨牙缺失,以及签署知情同意书。A组在鼻窦提升手术后每天接受波长为620±2 nm的LED光疗20分钟,共21天。B组作为对照组,未接受光疗。6个月后,重新打开移植部位进行种植体植入,并使用环钻获取骨活检样本。样本用苏木精和伊红染色,并在光学显微镜下检查。结果采用Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学分析。外科医生和病理学家均对患者的分组情况不知情。共分析了40个组织标本。两组在炎症程度、骨质和胶原成熟度方面无显著差异。组织学分析显示两组骨矿化区域无显著差异(>0.05)。结果表明,LED光疗不能显著增强鼻窦提升手术后的成骨作用。实验组未观察到副作用。