Suppr超能文献

采用改良的 Konyang 标准方法完成单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术。

Completion of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the modified Konyang standard method.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Konyang University Hospital, Konyang University College of Medicine, 158, Gwanjeodong-ro, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4992-5001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08856-6. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, a surgical method for single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has not been standardized. Therefore, this study aimed to introduce a standardized surgical method for SILC, in addition to reporting our experience over 10 years.

METHODS

Patients who underwent SILC at a single institution between April 2010 and December 2019 were included in this study. We analyzed the patient demographics and surgical outcomes according to the surgical method used: phase 1 (Konyang standard method, KSM) comprising initial 3-channel SILC, phase 2 (modified KSM, mKSM) comprising 4-channel SILC with a snake retractor, and phase 3 (commercial mKSM, C-mKSM) using a commercial 4-channel port.

RESULTS

Of 1372 patients (mean age, 51.3 years; 781 [56.9%] women), 418 (30.5%) surgeries were performed for acute cholecystitis (AC), 33 (2.4%) were converted to multiport or open cholecystectomy, and 49 (3.6%) developed postoperative complications. The mean operation time (OT) and length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) were 51.9 min and 2.6 days, respectively. Overall, 325 patients underwent SILC with the KSM, 660 with the mKSM, and 387 with the C-mKSM. In the C-mKSM group, the number of patients with AC was the lowest (26.8% vs. 38.2% vs. 20.4%, p < 0.001) and the OT (51.7 min vs. 55.4 min vs. 46.1 min, p < 0.001), estimated blood loss (24.5 mL vs. 15.5 mL vs. 6.1 mL, p < 0.001), and LOS (2.8 days vs. 2.5 days vs. 2.3 days, p = 0.001) were significantly improved. The surgical outcomes were better in the non-AC group than in the AC group.

CONCLUSION

Based on our 10 year experience, C-mKSM is a safe and feasible method of SILC in selected patients, although there were lower percentage of patients with AC compared to other groups.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)的手术方法尚未标准化。因此,本研究旨在介绍一种标准化的 SILC 手术方法,并报告我们 10 多年的经验。

方法

本研究纳入了 2010 年 4 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在一家医疗机构接受 SILC 的患者。我们根据手术方法分析了患者的人口统计学和手术结果:第 1 阶段(Konyang 标准方法,KSM)包括初始的 3 通道 SILC,第 2 阶段(改良 KSM,mKSM)包括使用蛇形牵开器的 4 通道 SILC,第 3 阶段(商业 mKSM,C-mKSM)使用商业 4 通道端口。

结果

在 1372 例患者(平均年龄 51.3 岁;781 例[56.9%]为女性)中,418 例(30.5%)因急性胆囊炎(AC)行手术治疗,33 例(2.4%)转为多孔或开放性胆囊切除术,49 例(3.6%)发生术后并发症。手术时间(OT)和术后住院时间(LOS)的平均值分别为 51.9 分钟和 2.6 天。总体而言,有 325 例患者接受 KSM 行 SILC,660 例患者接受 mKSM 行 SILC,387 例患者接受 C-mKSM 行 SILC。在 C-mKSM 组中,AC 患者的比例最低(26.8%比 38.2%比 20.4%,p<0.001),OT(51.7 分钟比 55.4 分钟比 46.1 分钟,p<0.001)、估计出血量(24.5 毫升比 15.5 毫升比 6.1 毫升,p<0.001)和 LOS(2.8 天比 2.5 天比 2.3 天,p=0.001)明显改善。非 AC 组的手术结果优于 AC 组。

结论

根据我们 10 年的经验,C-mKSM 是一种安全可行的 SILC 方法,尽管与其他组相比,AC 患者的比例较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验