Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medical Pharmacology, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul University; İstanbul-Turkey.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2021 Nov;25(11):753-761. doi: 10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2021.707.
In this study, we aimed to overview the drug interactions between colchicine and cardiovascular drugs and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the safety profile of colchicine in cardiovascular treatment.
The drug interactions between colchicine and cardiovascular drugs were evaluated using Medscape-Drug-Interaction-checker. For safety meta-analysis, a systematic literature search was carried out to retrieve eligible studies. Randomized controlled clinical trials that reported a safety analysis and with at least one-year follow-up period were included into the analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration.
Serious drug interactions were found between colchicine and lipid-lowering treatments, including all statins and fibrates; carvedilol among the beta-blockers; non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (verapamil and diltiazem); and amiodarone, digoxin, and quinidine. The safety meta-analysis involved 11,594 patients with coronary disease from four trials. The incidences of gastrointestinal adverse events; hematological adverse events; infection; pneumonia; cancer; myalgia; and abnormal nerve sensations were similar between colchicine and control arm. The incidence of cardiovascular death was lower in the colchicine arm; however, the difference did not reach a significant level [relative risk (RR): 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48–1.05; p=0.09]. The incidence of non-cardiovascular death was significantly higher in the colchicine arm (RR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.10–2.14; p=0.01). The rate of all-cause mortality was similar between the two arms (RR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.61–1.78; p=0.88).
Cardiac patients on colchicine therapy should be carefully monitored to avoid the complications of serious drugs interactions. The reported data in the literature were not sufficient to evaluate the common side effects such as gastrointestinal events and myalgia. The higher incidence of non-cardiovascular death cannot be ignored and should be thoroughly investigated in future studies.
本研究旨在综述秋水仙碱与心血管药物的相互作用,并进行荟萃分析以评估秋水仙碱在心血管治疗中的安全性。
使用 Medscape-Drug-Interaction-checker 评估秋水仙碱与心血管药物的相互作用。为了进行安全性荟萃分析,进行了系统文献检索以检索合格的研究。纳入了报告安全性分析且随访时间至少为 1 年的随机对照临床试验进行分析。使用 Cochrane 协作提供的 RevMan 5.4 软件进行荟萃分析。
发现秋水仙碱与降脂治疗(包括所有他汀类药物和贝特类药物)、β受体阻滞剂中的卡维地洛、非二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂(维拉帕米和地尔硫卓)以及胺碘酮、地高辛和奎尼丁之间存在严重的药物相互作用。安全性荟萃分析涉及四项试验中的 11594 名冠心病患者。秋水仙碱组和对照组胃肠道不良事件、血液学不良事件、感染、肺炎、癌症、肌痛和异常神经感觉的发生率相似。秋水仙碱组心血管死亡率较低,但差异无统计学意义[相对风险(RR):0.71,95%置信区间(CI)0.48-1.05;p=0.09]。秋水仙碱组非心血管死亡率显著升高[RR:1.53,95%CI 1.10-2.14;p=0.01]。两组的全因死亡率相似[RR:1.04,95%CI 0.61-1.78;p=0.88]。
接受秋水仙碱治疗的心脏病患者应密切监测,以避免严重药物相互作用的并发症。文献报道的数据不足以评估胃肠道事件和肌痛等常见副作用。不能忽视非心血管死亡率升高的问题,应在未来的研究中进行深入调查。