Department Chemie and Center for NanoScience (CeNS), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstr. 5-13, 81377 München, Germany.
Institut für Experimentelle und Angewandte Physik and Regensburg Center for Ultrafast Nanoscopy (RUN), Universität Regensburg, Universitätsstr. 31, 93040 Regensburg, Germany.
ACS Nano. 2021 Nov 23;15(11):18037-18047. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c06649. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
A single chromophore can only emit a maximum of one single photon per excitation cycle. This limitation results in a phenomenon commonly referred to as photon antibunching (pAB). When multiple chromophores contribute to the fluorescence measured, the degree of pAB has been used as a metric to "count" the number of chromophores. But the fact that chromophores can switch randomly between bright and dark states also impacts pAB and can lead to incorrect chromophore numbers being determined from pAB measurements. By both simulations and experiment, we demonstrate how pAB is affected by independent and collective chromophore blinking, enabling us to formulate universal guidelines for correct interpretation of pAB measurements. We use DNA-origami nanostructures to design multichromophoric model systems that exhibit either independent or collective chromophore blinking. Two approaches are presented that can distinguish experimentally between these two blinking mechanisms. The first one utilizes the different excitation intensity dependence on the blinking mechanisms. The second approach exploits the fact that collective blinking implies energy transfer to a quenching moiety, which is a time-dependent process. In pulsed-excitation experiments, the degree of collective blinking can therefore be altered by time gating the fluorescence photon stream, enabling us to extract the energy-transfer rate to a quencher. The ability to distinguish between different blinking mechanisms is valuable in materials science, such as for multichromophoric nanoparticles like conjugated-polymer chains as well as in biophysics, for example, for quantitative analysis of protein assemblies by counting chromophores.
单个发色团在每个激发循环中最多只能发射一个单光子。这种限制导致了一个通常被称为光子反聚束(pAB)的现象。当多个发色团对测量的荧光有贡献时,pAB 的程度已被用作“计数”发色团数量的指标。但是,发色团可以在亮态和暗态之间随机切换这一事实也会影响 pAB,并可能导致从 pAB 测量中确定不正确的发色团数量。通过模拟和实验,我们展示了 pAB 如何受到独立和集体发色团闪烁的影响,使我们能够为正确解释 pAB 测量制定通用指南。我们使用 DNA 折纸纳米结构来设计表现出独立或集体发色团闪烁的多色团模型系统。提出了两种方法,可以在实验上区分这两种闪烁机制。第一种方法利用了不同的激发强度对闪烁机制的依赖性。第二种方法利用了集体闪烁意味着能量转移到猝灭部分这一事实,这是一个时间相关的过程。因此,在脉冲激发实验中,可以通过时间门控荧光光子流来改变集体闪烁的程度,从而能够提取到猝灭剂的能量转移速率。区分不同闪烁机制的能力在材料科学中很有价值,例如对于共轭聚合物链等多色团纳米粒子,以及在生物物理学中,例如通过计数发色团对蛋白质组装进行定量分析。