Department of Psychology.
College of Education and Human Development.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Dec;30(6):907-917. doi: 10.1037/pha0000531. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
Although the Marijuana Problems Index (MPI) is widely used in studies with college student samples to reflect a unidimensional measure of cannabis-related problems, no studies have assessed the psychometric properties of the MPI in a college student population. The present study sought to resolve this gap in a sample of 879 college students reporting past-year cannabis use. Confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the factor structure of the unidimensional 23- and 18-item MPI and measurement invariance across gender. Bivariate correlations between the final factors, cannabis use history/frequency, and other substance use outcomes were used to examine concurrent and discriminant validities (i.e., vs. noncannabis outcomes). The 18-item (but not the 23-item) MPI demonstrated good model fit, measurement invariance across gender, adequate internal reliability, as well as concurrent and discriminant validities. Results support the use of the 18-item MPI over the 23-item MPI for conceptualizing problematic cannabis use, including the testing of gender-specific differences, among college students. Findings also reinforce the importance of evaluating the psychometric properties of widely used measures across samples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
尽管大麻问题指数(MPI)在具有大学生样本的研究中被广泛用于反映与大麻相关问题的单一维度衡量标准,但尚无研究在大学生群体中评估 MPI 的心理测量特性。本研究旨在解决这一空白,研究对象为 879 名报告过去一年大麻使用情况的大学生。使用验证性因素分析来检验多维 23 项和 18 项 MPI 的因子结构以及性别之间的测量不变性。最终因子与大麻使用史/频率之间的双变量相关性以及其他物质使用结果用于检验同时性和判别有效性(即与非大麻结果相比)。18 项(而非 23 项)MPI 表现出良好的模型拟合度、性别间的测量不变性、足够的内部可靠性以及同时性和判别有效性。研究结果支持在大学生中使用 18 项 MPI 而不是 23 项 MPI 来概念化有问题的大麻使用,包括测试性别特异性差异。研究结果还强调了在不同样本中评估广泛使用的测量工具的心理测量特性的重要性。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。