Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Ulmenweg 18, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2604-2610. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08348-0. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
We evaluated the influence of image reconstruction kernels on the diagnostic accuracy of CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) compared to invasive FFR in patients with coronary artery disease.
Sixty-nine patients, in whom coronary CT angiography was performed and who were further referred for invasive coronary angiography with FFR measurement via pressure wire, were retrospectively included. CT data sets were acquired using a third-generation dual-source CT system and rendered with medium smooth (Bv40) and sharp (Bv49) reconstruction kernels. FFR was calculated on-site using prototype software. Coronary stenoses with invasive FFR ≤ 0.80 were classified as significant. Agreement between FFR and invasive FFR was determined for both reconstruction kernels.
One hundred analyzed vessels in 69 patients were included. Twenty-five vessels were significantly stenosed according to invasive FFR. Using a sharp reconstruction kernel for FFR resulted in a significantly higher correlation with invasive FFR (r = 0.74, p < 0.01 vs. r = 0.58, p < 0.01; p = 0.04) and a higher AUC in ROC curve analysis to correctly identify/exclude significant stenosis (AUC = 0.92 vs. AUC = 0.82 for sharp vs. medium smooth kernel, respectively, p = 0.02). A FFR value of ≤ 0.8 using a sharp reconstruction kernel showed a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 92% for detecting ischemia-causing lesions, resulting in a diagnostic accuracy of 91%. The medium smooth reconstruction kernel performed worse (sensitivity 60%, specificity 89%, accuracy 82%).
Compared to invasively measured FFR, FFR using a sharp image reconstruction kernel shows higher diagnostic accuracy for detecting lesions causing ischemia, potentially altering decision-making in a clinical setting.
• Image reconstruction parameters influence the diagnostic accuracy of simulated fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography. • Using a sharp kernel image reconstruction algorithm delivers higher diagnostic accuracy compared to medium smooth kernel image reconstruction (gold standard invasive fractional flow reserve).
我们评估了与有创血流储备分数(FFR)相比,CT 衍生的分数流量储备(FFR)在冠状动脉疾病患者中,不同图像重建核对诊断准确性的影响。
回顾性纳入 69 例患者,这些患者进行了冠状动脉 CT 血管造影检查,且进一步接受了有创冠状动脉造影检查,通过压力导丝测量 FFR。使用第三代双源 CT 系统采集 CT 数据集,并使用中平滑(Bv40)和锐利(Bv49)重建核进行渲染。使用原型软件在现场计算 FFR。将有创 FFR≤0.80 的冠状动脉狭窄定义为显著狭窄。分别评估两种重建核的 FFR 与有创 FFR 的一致性。
纳入 69 例患者的 100 个分析血管。根据有创 FFR,25 个血管存在显著狭窄。使用锐利重建核计算 FFR 与有创 FFR 的相关性显著更高(r=0.74,p<0.01 与 r=0.58,p<0.01;p=0.04),ROC 曲线分析中正确识别/排除显著狭窄的 AUC 更高(AUC=0.92 与 AUC=0.82 分别用于锐利和中平滑核,p=0.02)。锐利重建核计算得出的 FFR 值≤0.8 用于检测引起缺血的病变,其敏感性为 88%,特异性为 92%,诊断准确性为 91%。中平滑重建核的性能较差(敏感性 60%,特异性 89%,准确性 82%)。
与有创测量的 FFR 相比,使用锐利图像重建核计算的 FFR 对检测引起缺血的病变具有更高的诊断准确性,这可能会改变临床环境中的决策。
·图像重建参数会影响从冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术衍生的模拟血流储备分数的诊断准确性。
·与中平滑核图像重建(有创血流储备分数的金标准)相比,使用锐利核图像重建算法可提供更高的诊断准确性。