• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于军事创伤的机器学习:作战区域新型大量输血预测模型

Machine Learning for Military Trauma: Novel Massive Transfusion Predictive Models in Combat Zones.

作者信息

Lammers Daniel, Marenco Christopher, Morte Kaitlin, Conner Jeffrey, Williams James, Bax Tim, Martin Matthew, Eckert Matthew, Bingham Jason

机构信息

Department Of General Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington.

Department Of General Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2022 Feb;270:369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.017
PMID:34736129
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Damage control resuscitation has become the standard of care in military and civilian trauma. Early identification of blood product requirements may aid in optimizing the clinical decision-making process while improving trauma related outcomes. This study aimed to assess and compare multiple machine learning models for predicting patients at highest risk for massive transfusion on the battlefield.

METHODS

Supervised machine learning approaches using logistic regression, support vector machine, neural network, and random forest techniques were used to create predictive models for massive transfusion using standard prehospital and arrival data points from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry, 2008-2016. Seventy percent of the population was used for model development and performance was validated using the remaining 30%. Models were tested for accuracy and compared by standard performance statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 22,158 patients (97% male, 58% penetrating injury, median age 25-29 y/o, average Injury Severity Score 9, with an overall mortality of 3%) were included in the analysis. Massive transfusion was required by 7.4% of patients. Overall accuracy was found to be above 90% in all models tested. Following cross validation and model training, the random forest model outperformed the alternatively tested models for precision, recall, and area under the curve.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning techniques may allow for more optimal and rapid identification of combat trauma patients at highest risk for massive transfusion. These powerful approaches may uncover novel correlations and help improve triage, activation of massive transfusion resources, and trauma-related outcomes. Further research seeking to optimize and apply these algorithms to trauma-centered research should be pursued.

摘要

背景

损伤控制复苏已成为军事和民用创伤治疗的标准。早期确定血液制品需求可能有助于优化临床决策过程,同时改善创伤相关结局。本研究旨在评估和比较多种机器学习模型,以预测战场上最有可能大量输血的患者。

方法

使用逻辑回归、支持向量机、神经网络和随机森林技术等监督机器学习方法,利用2008 - 2016年国防部创伤登记处的标准院前和入院数据点,创建大量输血的预测模型。70%的人群用于模型开发,其余30%用于验证模型性能。对模型进行准确性测试,并通过标准性能统计进行比较。

结果

共有22158例患者(97%为男性,58%为穿透伤,中位年龄25 - 29岁,平均损伤严重度评分9分,总死亡率3%)纳入分析。7.4%的患者需要大量输血。在所有测试模型中,总体准确率均高于90%。经过交叉验证和模型训练,随机森林模型在精度、召回率和曲线下面积方面优于其他测试模型。

结论

机器学习技术可能有助于更优化、快速地识别最有可能大量输血的战斗创伤患者。这些强大的方法可能揭示新的相关性,并有助于改善分诊、激活大量输血资源以及创伤相关结局。应进一步开展研究,寻求优化并将这些算法应用于以创伤为中心的研究。

相似文献

1
Machine Learning for Military Trauma: Novel Massive Transfusion Predictive Models in Combat Zones.用于军事创伤的机器学习:作战区域新型大量输血预测模型
J Surg Res. 2022 Feb;270:369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Machine learning models predict triage levels, massive transfusion protocol activation, and mortality in trauma utilizing patients hemodynamics on admission.机器学习模型利用创伤患者入院时的血流动力学来预测分诊级别、大量输血方案的激活和死亡率。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Sep;179:108880. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108880. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
3
The Algorithm Examining the Risk of Massive Transfusion (ALERT) Score Accurately Predicts Massive Transfusion at the Scene of Injury and on Arrival to the Trauma Bay: A Retrospective Analysis.《算法评估创伤患者大量输血风险(ALERT)评分》能够准确预测创伤现场和创伤复苏室的大量输血:一项回顾性分析。
Shock. 2021 Oct 1;56(4):529-536. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001772.
4
Prediction of massive blood transfusion in battlefield trauma: Development and validation of the Military Acute Severe Haemorrhage (MASH) score.战场创伤中大量输血的预测:军事急性严重出血(MASH)评分的开发与验证
Injury. 2018 Feb;49(2):184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.029. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Machine learning in the prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: a retrospective analysis as a proof-of-concept.机器学习在创伤患者大量输血预测中的应用:一项作为概念验证的回顾性分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):1073-1081. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02423-5. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
6
An Assessment of Clinical Accuracy of Vital Sign-based Triage Tools Among U.S. and Coalition Forces.基于生命体征的分诊工具在美国和联军部队中的临床准确性评估。
Mil Med. 2024 Jul 3;189(7-8):e1528-e1536. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad500.
7
Prehospital end-tidal carbon dioxide predicts massive transfusion and death following trauma.创伤后院前呼气末二氧化碳预测大量输血和死亡。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):703-707. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002846.
8
Utilization of Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Mortality in Pediatric Warzone Casualties.利用机器学习方法预测儿科战区伤员的死亡率。
Mil Med. 2024 Jan 23;189(1-2):345-351. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac171.
9
Utilizing a trauma systems approach to benchmark and improve combat casualty care.采用创伤系统方法来进行基准评估并改善战伤救治。
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69 Suppl 1:S5-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e421f3.
10
Shock Index as a Predictor of Massive Transfusion and Emergency Surgery on the Modern Battlefield.冲击指数在现代战场上对大量输血和急诊手术的预测价值。
J Surg Res. 2020 Dec;256:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Model for Predicting the Abbreviated Injury Scale in Patients with Trauma: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.基于Transformer模型的双向编码器表征在创伤患者简明损伤定级预测中的应用:算法开发与验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 29;9:e67311. doi: 10.2196/67311.
2
Use of artificial intelligence to support prehospital traumatic injury care: A scoping review.利用人工智能支持院前创伤护理:一项范围综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Sep 4;5(5):e13251. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13251. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
AI algorithm for personalized resource allocation and treatment of hemorrhage casualties.
用于个性化资源分配和出血伤员治疗的人工智能算法。
Front Physiol. 2024 Jan 25;15:1327948. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1327948. eCollection 2024.
4
Machine learning in the prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: a retrospective analysis as a proof-of-concept.机器学习在创伤患者大量输血预测中的应用:一项作为概念验证的回顾性分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):1073-1081. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02423-5. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Machine learning in transfusion medicine: A scoping review.输血医学中的机器学习:一项范围综述。
Transfusion. 2024 Jan;64(1):162-184. doi: 10.1111/trf.17582. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
On Scene Injury Severity Prediction (OSISP) model for trauma developed using the Swedish Trauma Registry.基于瑞典创伤登记处开发的创伤现场损伤严重程度预测 (OSISP) 模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 9;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02290-5.
7
Artificial intelligence and machine learning in prehospital emergency care: A scoping review.院前急救中的人工智能与机器学习:一项范围综述。
iScience. 2023 Jul 17;26(8):107407. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107407. eCollection 2023 Aug 18.
8
Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care.人工智能和机器学习在出血性创伤护理中的应用。
Mil Med Res. 2023 Feb 16;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00444-0.