Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Resident physician, Internal medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Heart Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Jul;36(7):2022-2030. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.09.049. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and types of interventions triggered during a drop of baseline near-infraredspectroscopy (NIRS) values in consecutive cardiac surgical patients.
A single-center, retrospective observational study.
A university-affiliated tertiary care center.
Three thousand three hundred two consecutive cardiac surgical patients from October 2016 to August 2017 Interventions: None.
Of the 1,972 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 576 (29.2%) patients showed NIRS deviation of -20% from baseline. Interventions performed during the drop of baseline NIRS values were documented in 285 (14.4%) patients, with a total of 391 interventions. Three hundred fifteen (80%) interventions were triggered by a deviation in NIRS and concomitant changes in standard monitoring parameters. Seventy-six (20%) interventions were triggered by NIRS deviation alone, with no concomitant pathologic deviation in standard monitoring. A total of 279 (71%) interventions were performed on patients who had no recommendation for NIRS monitoring by current national guidelines. Out of these, 30 (7.7%) interventions (1.3% of all patients) were performed based on NIRS monitoring alone. The higher risk deviation group had longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stays (one and 15 days) and postoperative delirium when compared with the no-deviation group (zero and 13 days) Conclusions: The authors' data suggested that most interventions triggered during the drop of baseline values during routine use of NIRS would have also been triggered by the concomitant changes in standard monitoring parameters. Routine use of NIRS for all cardiac surgical patients still is debatable and needs to be evaluated in a large prospective trial.
本研究旨在确定连续心脏外科患者基线近红外光谱(NIRS)值下降时触发的干预措施的发生率和类型。
单中心回顾性观察性研究。
一家大学附属医院的三级护理中心。
2016 年 10 月至 2017 年 8 月期间的 3322 例连续心脏外科患者。
无。
在符合纳入标准的 1972 例患者中,有 576 例(29.2%)患者的 NIRS 偏离基线 20%。在基线 NIRS 值下降期间进行的干预措施记录在 285 例(14.4%)患者中,共进行了 391 次干预。315 次(80%)干预是由 NIRS 偏差和标准监测参数的同时变化触发的。76 次(20%)干预是由 NIRS 偏差单独触发的,标准监测中没有同时出现病理性偏差。共有 279 次(71%)干预是在当前国家指南没有推荐 NIRS 监测的患者中进行的。在这些患者中,有 30 次(7.7%)干预(占所有患者的 1.3%)是仅根据 NIRS 监测进行的。与无偏差组(零和 13 天)相比,高风险偏差组的重症监护病房和住院时间(分别为 1 天和 15 天)和术后谵妄时间更长。
作者的数据表明,在常规使用 NIRS 期间,基线值下降期间触发的大多数干预措施也将由标准监测参数的同时变化触发。对所有心脏外科患者常规使用 NIRS 仍存在争议,需要在大型前瞻性试验中进行评估。