• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄调整后的快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分在预测感染儿童死亡率和疾病严重程度中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Age-adjusted quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting mortality and disease severity in children with infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 4;11(1):21699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01271-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-01271-w
PMID:34737369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8568945/
Abstract

We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the age-adjusted quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (qSOFA) for predicting mortality and disease severity in pediatric patients with suspected or confirmed infection. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Eleven studies with a total of 172,569 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of the age-adjusted qSOFA for predicting mortality and disease severity were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.81), 0.71 (95% CI 0.36-0.91), and 6.57 (95% CI 4.46-9.67), respectively. The area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.733. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting mortality were 0.73 (95% CI 0.66-0.79) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.21-0.92), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for predicting disease severity were 0.73 (95% CI 0.21-0.97) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.11-0.98), respectively. The performance of the age-adjusted qSOFA for predicting mortality and disease severity was better in emergency department patients than in intensive care unit patients. The age-adjusted qSOFA has moderate predictive power and can help in rapidly identifying at-risk children, but its utility may be limited by its insufficient sensitivity.

摘要

我们评估了年龄调整后快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分(qSOFA)在预测疑似或确诊感染的儿科患者死亡率和疾病严重程度方面的诊断准确性。我们对 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 进行了系统检索。共有 11 项研究,总计 172569 例患者纳入了荟萃分析。年龄调整后 qSOFA 预测死亡率和疾病严重程度的汇总敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比分别为 0.69(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.53-0.81)、0.71(95% CI 0.36-0.91)和 6.57(95% CI 4.46-9.67)。汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.733。预测死亡率的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 0.73(95% CI 0.66-0.79)和 0.63(95% CI 0.21-0.92)。预测疾病严重程度的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为 0.73(95% CI 0.21-0.97)和 0.72(95% CI 0.11-0.98)。年龄调整后 qSOFA 在急诊科患者中预测死亡率和疾病严重程度的性能优于重症监护病房患者。年龄调整后 qSOFA 具有中等的预测能力,可以帮助快速识别高危儿童,但由于其敏感性不足,其应用可能受到限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b619/8568945/eae0f250de26/41598_2021_1271_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b619/8568945/7add4d786f81/41598_2021_1271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b619/8568945/319fa319bb5e/41598_2021_1271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b619/8568945/eae0f250de26/41598_2021_1271_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b619/8568945/7add4d786f81/41598_2021_1271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b619/8568945/319fa319bb5e/41598_2021_1271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b619/8568945/eae0f250de26/41598_2021_1271_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Age-adjusted quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting mortality and disease severity in children with infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.年龄调整后的快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分在预测感染儿童死亡率和疾病严重程度中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 4;11(1):21699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01271-w.
2
Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies.快速序贯器官衰竭评估 (qSOFA) 评分和全身性炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 标准对疑似感染住院患者死亡率预测的准确性:观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
3
Prognostic accuracy of SOFA and qSOFA for mortality among children with infection: a meta-analysis.SOFA 和 qSOFA 对感染患儿死亡率预后准确性的荟萃分析。
Pediatr Res. 2023 Mar;93(4):763-771. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02213-6. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
4
Performance of the quick Sequential (sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分在重症监护室外感染患者中的预后工具性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 6;22(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1952-x.
5
[Evaluation value of the quick sequential organ failure assessment score on prognosis of intensive care unit adult patients with infection: a 17-year observation study from the real world].快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对重症监护病房成年感染患者预后的评估价值:一项基于现实世界的17年观察性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jun;30(6):544-548. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.008.
6
Combining quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment with plasma lactate concentration is comparable to standard Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting mortality of patients with and without suspected infection.将快速序贯器官衰竭评估与血浆乳酸浓度相结合,在预测有或无疑似感染患者的死亡率方面,与标准序贯器官衰竭评估评分相当。
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
7
Quick-SOFA score to predict mortality among geriatric patients with influenza in the emergency department.应用快速序贯器官衰竭评估(Quick-SOFA)评分预测急诊科老年流感患者的死亡率
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15966. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015966.
8
[Clinical value of Oxford acute severity of illness score in identifying quick sequential organ failure assessment-negative patients with sepsis].牛津急性疾病严重程度评分在识别序贯器官衰竭评估阴性的脓毒症患者中的临床价值
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2018 Sep 12;41(9):701-708. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2018.09.010.
9
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
10
Quick sequential organ failure assessment score combined with other sepsis-related risk factors to predict in-hospital mortality: Post-hoc analysis of prospective multicenter study data.快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分结合其他脓毒症相关危险因素预测住院死亡率:前瞻性多中心研究数据的事后分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254343. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of attributable mortality in pediatric patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit for suspected infection: A comprehensive evaluation of risk scores.预测因疑似感染而入住重症监护病房的儿科癌症患者的归因死亡率:风险评分的综合评估。
Cancer Med. 2023 Dec;12(23):21287-21292. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6709. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
External validation of clinical severity scores to guide referral of paediatric acute respiratory infections in resource-limited primary care settings.临床严重程度评分在资源有限的基层医疗环境中指导儿科急性呼吸道感染转诊的外部验证。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 3;13(1):19026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45746-4.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A novel severity score to predict inpatient mortality in COVID-19 patients.一种预测 COVID-19 患者住院死亡率的新型严重程度评分。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 7;10(1):16726. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73962-9.
2
Accuracy of a Modified qSOFA Score for Predicting Critical Care Admission in Febrile Children.改良 qSOFA 评分对预测发热儿童入住重症监护病房的准确性。
Pediatrics. 2020 Oct;146(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0782.
3
Sepsis therapies: learning from 30 years of failure of translational research to propose new leads.脓毒症治疗:从30年转化研究失败中吸取教训以提出新线索。
Defining the role of host biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of the severity of childhood pneumonia: a prospective cohort study.
定义宿主生物标志物在儿童肺炎严重程度的诊断和预后中的作用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 25;13(1):12024. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38731-4.
EMBO Mol Med. 2020 Apr 7;12(4):e10128. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201810128. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
4
Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments, time to treatment, and association with mortality: An observational study.急诊科脓毒症的早期诊断、治疗时间与死亡率的关系:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 22;15(1):e0227652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227652. eCollection 2020.
5
To what extent are GCS and AVPU equivalent to each other when assessing the level of consciousness of children with head injury? A cross-sectional study of UK hospital admissions.在评估头部受伤儿童的意识水平时,格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和AVPU量表的等效程度如何?一项针对英国医院入院病例的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 28;8(11):e023216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023216.
6
Translating Sepsis-3 Criteria in Children: Prognostic Accuracy of Age-Adjusted Quick SOFA Score in Children Visiting the Emergency Department With Suspected Bacterial Infection.儿童脓毒症-3标准的翻译:年龄校正快速序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分对疑似细菌感染患儿就诊急诊科时的预后准确性
Front Pediatr. 2018 Oct 1;6:266. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00266. eCollection 2018.
7
SIRS or qSOFA? Is that the question? Clinical and methodological observations from a meta-analysis and critical review on the prognostication of patients with suspected sepsis outside the ICU.全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)还是快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)?这是问题所在吗?一项关于 ICU 外疑似脓毒症患者预后预测的荟萃分析和批判性评价的临床和方法学观察。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;14(4):593-602. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1965-0. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
8
Assessment of clinical outcome of children with sepsis outside the intensive care unit.评估重症监护室外脓毒症患儿的临床转归。
Eur J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;177(12):1775-1783. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3247-2. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
9
Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.头对头比较 qSOFA 和 SIRS 标准在预测急诊科感染患者死亡率中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jul 11;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0527-9.
10
Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring of septic shock in children.儿童脓毒性休克的无创血流动力学监测
World J Methodol. 2018 Jun 28;8(1):1-8. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v8.i1.1.