• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺细针穿刺细胞学的统计学分析。对678例病例及文献中4265例病例的回顾。

Statistical analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. A review of 678 cases plus 4,265 cases from the literature.

作者信息

Hammond S, Keyhani-Rofagha S, O'Toole R V

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1987 May-Jun;31(3):276-80.

PMID:3473860
Abstract

Between 1979 and 1984, 678 breast fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytologic specimens were received in our laboratory; tissue follow-up was available for 159 cases (23%). The diagnoses rendered in cases with subsequent tissue study were benign (41%), insufficient (10.5%), atypical and/or suspicious for carcinoma (10.5%) and malignant (38%). Using the tissue diagnosis as the standard, there were four false-negative cytologic results and one false-positive result. Considering only cases with a definitive diagnosis of benign or malignant, the sensitivity of cytologic interpretation for diagnosing malignancy on adequate material was 94% while the specificity was 98%; the overall efficiency of the test was thus 96%. The predictive values were 98% for a positive test and 94% for a negative test. Of the total number of submitted cases, a correct and definitive diagnosis was rendered 76% of the time. Calculation of similar statistics from six other series in which the FNA cytologic diagnoses were compared with the histologic diagnoses yielded data almost identical to our findings. The high degree of uniformity in the data indicates that these statistical parameters can be used as standards for evaluating the efficiency of breast FNA cytology.

摘要

1979年至1984年间,我们实验室共收到678例乳腺细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学标本;其中159例(23%)有组织学随访结果。后续进行组织学检查的病例诊断结果为良性(41%)、标本不足(10.5%)、非典型和/或可疑癌(10.5%)以及恶性(38%)。以组织学诊断为标准,有4例假阴性细胞学结果和1例假阳性结果。仅考虑明确诊断为良性或恶性的病例,在足够标本的情况下,细胞学诊断恶性肿瘤的敏感性为94%,特异性为98%;因此该检查的总效率为96%。阳性检查的预测值为98%,阴性检查的预测值为94%。在所有送检病例中,76%的病例获得了正确明确的诊断。对其他六个将FNA细胞学诊断与组织学诊断进行比较的系列进行类似统计计算,得出的数据与我们的结果几乎相同。数据的高度一致性表明,这些统计参数可用作评估乳腺FNA细胞学检查效率的标准。

相似文献

1
Statistical analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. A review of 678 cases plus 4,265 cases from the literature.乳腺细针穿刺细胞学的统计学分析。对678例病例及文献中4265例病例的回顾。
Acta Cytol. 1987 May-Jun;31(3):276-80.
2
Role of fine needle aspiration in diagnosing breast lesions.细针穿刺在乳腺病变诊断中的作用。
Saudi Med J. 2002 Aug;23(8):915-20.
3
Aspiration of the breast and nipple discharge cytology.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Nov;163(5):415-20.
4
Specimen adequacy and false-negative diagnosis rate in fine-needle aspirates of palpable breast masses.可触及乳腺肿块细针穿刺抽吸物的标本充足率及假阴性诊断率
Cancer. 1998 Dec 25;84(6):344-8.
5
Accuracy of cytologic diagnoses made from touch imprints of image-guided needle biopsy specimens of nonpalpable breast abnormalities.通过影像引导下对不可触及乳腺异常进行针吸活检标本制作的触摸印片进行细胞学诊断的准确性。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2000 Jul;23(1):29-34. doi: 10.1002/1097-0339(200007)23:1<29::AID-DC7>3.0.CO;2-8.
6
Analysis of false results in a series of 835 fine needle aspirates of breast lesions.835例乳腺病变细针穿刺抽吸假结果分析。
Acta Cytol. 1995 Sep-Oct;39(5):858-64.
7
The value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of palpable breast lesions.细针穿刺活检在可触及乳腺病变诊断及预后评估中的价值。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2012 Jan;40(1):26-34. doi: 10.1002/dc.21497. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
8
Negative predictive value of pulmonary fine needle aspiration cytology.肺细针穿刺细胞学检查的阴性预测值
Acta Cytol. 1992 May-Jun;36(3):283-6.
9
Role of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of indeterminate and suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the initial staging of breast carcinoma.超声引导下对不确定及可疑腋窝淋巴结进行细针穿刺在乳腺癌初始分期中的作用。
Cancer. 2002 Sep 1;95(5):982-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10786.
10
'Atypical' and 'suspicious' diagnoses in breast aspiration cytology.乳腺穿刺细胞学检查中的“非典型”和“可疑”诊断
Cancer. 2004 Jun 25;102(3):164-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20283.

引用本文的文献

1
Current management of carcinoma of the breast.乳腺癌的当前治疗方法
Ann Surg. 1994 Aug;220(2):121-36. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199408000-00003.