• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供体 ICU 住院时间对小儿肝移植后使用全肝和体外劈裂肝移植患者结局的影响。

Impact of length of donor ICU stay on outcome of patients after pediatric liver transplantation with whole and ex situ split liver grafts.

机构信息

Pediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology, and Obstetrics, Swiss Pediatric Liver Center, University Center of Pediatric Surgery of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology, and Obstetrics, Swiss Pediatric Liver Center, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pediatr Transplant. 2022 Mar;26(2):e14186. doi: 10.1111/petr.14186. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1111/petr.14186
PMID:34738698
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients who have a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often excluded for organ donation because of supposed deleterious effects of a lengthy ICU stay. We aimed to determine the effects of a prolonged donor stay in the ICU on the outcome of liver transplantation (LT) in children.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 89 pediatric LT patients, age 0-18 years, period 2003-2018, including patients having undergone whole organ or in situ split LT. The patients were divided into two groups according to the donor length of stay in the ICU. A prolonged stay was defined as >5 days. Recipient, graft, and donor characteristics were compared; outcome parameters included recipient and graft survival rates and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Group short (donor ICU stay <5 days) included 75 patients, group long (donor ICU stay >5 days) 14 patients. Baseline characteristics between recipients did not differ. Donors in group long had significantly more infectious complications and a higher gamma glutamyl transferase (gGT) the day of organ recovery. Incidence of biliary complications post-LT was significantly higher in group long (p = .029). Patient and graft survival rates did not differ significantly between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Donors with a prolonged stay in the ICU should still be considered for liver donation if they fulfill most other selection criteria. Recipients from donors having stayed in ICU >5 days may be at increased risk of biliary complications.

摘要

背景

由于 ICU 住院时间过长可能会产生有害影响,因此在 ICU 住院时间过长的患者通常被排除在器官捐献之外。我们旨在确定 ICU 中供体停留时间延长对儿童肝移植(LT)结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析了 2003 年至 2018 年间 89 例年龄 0-18 岁的小儿 LT 患者的资料,包括接受过全器官或原位劈裂 LT 的患者。根据供体在 ICU 中的停留时间将患者分为两组。长时间停留定义为 >5 天。比较患者、移植物和供体的特征;结果参数包括受者和移植物的生存率和术后并发症。

结果

组短(供体 ICU 停留时间 <5 天)包括 75 例患者,组长(供体 ICU 停留时间 >5 天)包括 14 例患者。两组受者的基线特征无差异。组长大的供体有明显更多的感染性并发症和更高的谷氨酰转移酶(gGT)在器官恢复当天。组长大的患者 LT 后胆并发症的发生率显著更高(p =.029)。两组患者和移植物的生存率无显著差异。

结论

如果符合大多数其他选择标准,ICU 中长时间停留的供体仍应考虑进行肝捐献。来自 ICU 住院时间超过 5 天的供体的受者可能有更高的胆道并发症风险。

相似文献

1
Impact of length of donor ICU stay on outcome of patients after pediatric liver transplantation with whole and ex situ split liver grafts.供体 ICU 住院时间对小儿肝移植后使用全肝和体外劈裂肝移植患者结局的影响。
Pediatr Transplant. 2022 Mar;26(2):e14186. doi: 10.1111/petr.14186. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
2
Early complications after liver transplantation in children and adults: Are split grafts equal to each other and equal to whole livers?儿童和成人肝移植后的早期并发症:劈裂式移植物彼此之间以及与全肝是否等效?
Pediatr Transplant. 2017 Jun;21(4). doi: 10.1111/petr.12908. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
3
One hundred in situ split-liver transplantations: a single-center experience.100例原位劈离式肝移植:单中心经验
Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):496-505; discussion 506-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000089852.29654.72.
4
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Achieved With Live Donor and Split Deceased Donor Liver Grafts in Pediatric Liver Transplantation.比较活体供肝与劈离式供肝在儿童肝移植中获得的长期疗效。
Pediatr Transplant. 2024 Sep;28(6):e14843. doi: 10.1111/petr.14843.
5
Feasibility and Safety of Split-Liver Transplantation in a Nascent Framework of Deceased Donation.在新兴的脑死亡器官捐献框架下活体肝移植的可行性与安全性
Liver Transpl. 2019 Mar;25(3):450-458. doi: 10.1002/lt.25405.
6
Feasibility and limits of split liver transplantation from pediatric donors: an italian multicenter experience.小儿供体劈离式肝移植的可行性与局限性:一项意大利多中心经验
Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):805-14. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000218076.85213.60.
7
Risk Factors of Prolonged ICU Stay in Liver Transplant Recipients in a Single-Center Experience.单中心经验:肝移植受者入住重症监护病房时间延长的危险因素
Transplant Proc. 2018 Sep;50(7):2014-2017. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.143. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
8
Split liver transplantation.劈离式肝移植
Ann Surg. 1999 Mar;229(3):313-21. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199903000-00003.
9
High MELD score and extended operating time predict prolonged initial ICU stay after liver transplantation and influence the outcome.高终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分和延长的手术时间预示着肝移植术后最初入住重症监护病房(ICU)的时间延长,并影响预后。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 20;12(3):e0174173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174173. eCollection 2017.
10
Liver transplantation in the United States: a report from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.美国的肝脏移植:器官获取与移植网络的一份报告。
Clin Transpl. 2000:19-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Organ donation after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.体外心肺复苏后器官捐献:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2024 May 13;28(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04949-5.
2
The Role of Donor Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase as a Risk Factor for Early Graft Function after Liver Transplantation.供体γ-谷氨酰转移酶作为肝移植后早期移植物功能危险因素的作用
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 18;12(14):4744. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144744.
3
Outcome and Midterm Survival after Heart Transplantation Is Independent from Donor Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit.
心脏移植后的结局和中期生存率与供体在重症监护病房的住院时间无关。
Life (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;12(7):1053. doi: 10.3390/life12071053.
4
Normothermic Machine Perfusion-Improving the Supply of Transplantable Livers for High-Risk Recipients.常温机械灌注——提高高危受体可移植肝脏的供应。
Transpl Int. 2022 May 31;35:10460. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10460. eCollection 2022.