Kennedy Kristin M, Wang Ellen, Rodriguez Samuel T, Qian Jimmy, Khoury Michael, Kist Madison N, Jackson Christian, Yun Romy, Caruso Thomas J
Stanford University School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 453 Quarry Road MC5663, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 2022 Feb;76:110569. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110569. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
HRAD± was developed to quickly evaluate pediatric preprocedural affect and cooperativity during mask induction of anesthesia and peripheral intravenous (PIV) placement. HRAD± represents: Happy, Relaxed, Anxious, Distressed, with a yes/no answer to cooperativity. The primary aim of this study was to compare HRAD± to previously published scales.
We conducted an observational study.
Videos of pediatric patients were collected in the perioperative environment.
Twenty-four children, twenty-one pediatric anesthesiologists and twenty pediatric perioperative providers were included.
To assess the reliability of HRAD±, standard patient videos were created. Children underwent mask induction or PIV placement, and these interventions were video recorded. Mask induction and PIV placement videos were rated by pediatric anesthesiologists and perioperative non-physician providers respectively using HRAD±.
Two trained researchers provided the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS), Observation Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD), and Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) scores, and we calculated correlations to HRAD±, inter-rater reliability, and intra-rater reliability.
HRAD± scores strongly correlated with mYPAS (r = 0.846, p < 0.0001) and OSBD scores (r = 0.723, p < 0.0001). Cooperativity scores correlated strongly with ICC scores in the mask induction group (r = -0.715, p < 0.0001) and in the PIV group (r = -0.869, p < 0.0001). HRAD± inter-rater reliability for mask induction was 0.414 (p < 0.0001) and for PIV assessment was 0.378 (p < 0.0001). Inter-rater reliability for cooperativity on mask induction was 0.797 (p < 0.0001) and PIV assessment was 0.683 (p < 0.0001). Intra-rater reliability for mask induction was 0.675 and PIV assessments was 0.678. Intra-rater reliability for cooperativity for mask induction was 0.894 and for PIV assessments was 0.765.
HRAD± is an efficient and reliable scale that serves as a practical alternative for measuring pediatric affect during mask induction and PIV placement. The results demonstrate strong correlation with commonly utilized yet more complex affect scales.
开发HRAD±用于快速评估小儿在面罩诱导麻醉和外周静脉穿刺(PIV)置管过程中的术前情绪和合作程度。HRAD±代表:开心、放松、焦虑、痛苦,并对合作程度给出是/否的回答。本研究的主要目的是将HRAD±与先前发表的量表进行比较。
我们进行了一项观察性研究。
在围手术期环境中收集小儿患者的视频。
纳入了24名儿童、21名小儿麻醉医生和20名小儿围手术期医护人员。
为评估HRAD±的可靠性,制作了标准患者视频。儿童接受面罩诱导或PIV置管,并对这些干预过程进行视频记录。面罩诱导和PIV置管视频分别由小儿麻醉医生和围手术期非医生医护人员使用HRAD±进行评分。
两名经过培训的研究人员提供改良耶鲁术前焦虑量表(mYPAS)、行为痛苦观察量表(OSBD)和诱导依从性检查表(ICC)的评分,我们计算了与HRAD±的相关性、评分者间信度和评分者内信度。
HRAD±评分与mYPAS(r = 0.846,p < 0.0001)和OSBD评分(r = 0.723,p < 0.0001)密切相关。面罩诱导组(r = -0.715,p < 0.0001)和PIV组(r = -0.869,p < 0.0001)的合作程度评分与ICC评分密切相关。面罩诱导的HRAD±评分者间信度为0.414(p < 0.0001),PIV评估的评分者间信度为0.378(p < 0.0001)。面罩诱导合作程度的评分者间信度为0.797(p < 0.0001),PIV评估的为0.683(p < 0.0001)。面罩诱导的评分者内信度为0.675,PIV评估的为0.678。面罩诱导合作程度的评分者内信度为0.894,PIV评估的为0.765。
HRAD±是一种有效且可靠的量表,可作为测量小儿在面罩诱导和PIV置管过程中情绪的实用替代方法。结果表明其与常用但更复杂的情绪量表密切相关。