科学界和法庭的公开实践。
Open practices in our science and our courtrooms.
机构信息
Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA.
Department of Computer Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699, USA.
出版信息
Trends Genet. 2022 Feb;38(2):113-115. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
Abstract
Advocates of transparency in science often point to the benefits of open practices for the scientific process. Here, we focus on a possibly underappreciated effect of standards for transparency: their influence on non-scientific decisions. As a case study, we consider the current state of probabilistic genotyping software in forensics.
摘要
透明度倡导者在科学中经常指出开放实践对科学过程的好处。在这里，我们专注于透明度标准的一个可能被低估的影响：它们对非科学决策的影响。作为一个案例研究，我们考虑当前法医概率基因分型软件的状态。
相似文献
1
Open practices in our science and our courtrooms.科学界和法庭的公开实践。
Trends Genet. 2022 Feb;38(2):113-115. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
2
U.S. initiatives to strengthen forensic science & international standards in forensic DNA.美国加强法医学及法医DNA国际标准的举措。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Sep;18:4-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
3
Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency.超越 CSI：通过开放和透明来校准公众对法医学可靠性的信念。
Sci Justice. 2022 May;62(3):272-283. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
A call for open science in forensics.呼吁法医学领域的开放科学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 11;121(24):e2321809121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321809121. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Introduction to the work towards standardization in the field of forensic genetics at the first Lodz meeting of the Expert Team for Standards and Assessment in Forensic Genetics of the Polish Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (TSA-ISFG.PL).在国际法医遗传学协会波兰语工作组法医遗传学标准与评估专家团队（TSA-ISFG.PL）于罗兹召开的首次会议上，法医遗传学领域标准化工作介绍
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2018;68(2):149-156. doi: 10.5114/amsik.2018.77921.
6
Definitions and Historical Perspectives in Environmental Forensics.环境取证中的定义和历史观点。
Microbiol Spectr. 2018 Mar;6(2). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.EMF-0016-2018.
7
Editorial considerations for publication in Forensic Science International: Genetics.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2023 Jul;65:102877. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102877. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
8
Uncharted waters: Next-generation sequencing and machine learning software allow forensic science to expand into phenotype prediction from DNA samples.未知领域：下一代测序和机器学习软件使法医学能够从 DNA 样本扩展到表型预测。
EMBO Rep. 2018 Mar;19(3). doi: 10.15252/embr.201845810. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
What does a digital forensics opinion look like? A comparative study of digital forensics and forensic science reporting practices.一份数字取证意见书是什么样的？数字取证与法医学报告实践的比较研究。
Sci Justice. 2021 Sep;61(5):586-596. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
10
Forensic science.法医学
Anal Chem. 2009 Jun 15;81(12):4695-711. doi: 10.1021/ac9008786.
引用本文的文献
1
On forensic likelihood ratios from low-coverage sequencing.关于低覆盖度测序的法医似然比
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2025 Sep;79:103302. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2025.103302. Epub 2025 May 27.
2
Decreased accuracy of forensic DNA mixture analysis for groups with lower genetic diversity.遗传多样性较低群体的法医DNA混合分析准确性降低。
iScience. 2024 Sep 28;27(11):111067. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111067. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
3
On forensic likelihood ratios from low-coverage sequencing.关于低覆盖度测序的法医似然比
bioRxiv. 2024 Nov 24:2024.05.24.595821. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.24.595821.
本文引用的文献
1
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
2
Access and Management: Indigenous Perspectives on Genomic Data Sharing.获取和管理：基因组数据共享的本土视角。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Dec 12;29(Suppl 3):659-668. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S3.659. eCollection 2019.
3
Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.概率基因型分析软件：概述。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jan;38:219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
4
The Probabilistic Genotyping Software STRmix: Utility and Evidence for its Validity.概率基因分型软件STRmix：其实用性及其有效性的证据
J Forensic Sci. 2019 Mar;64(2):393-405. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13898. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
5
Validation of probabilistic genotyping software for use in forensic DNA casework: Definitions and illustrations.用于法医DNA案件工作的概率基因分型软件的验证：定义与示例
Sci Justice. 2016 Mar;56(2):104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
6
Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors.可重复性：错误的悲剧。
Nature. 2016 Feb 4;530(7588):27-9. doi: 10.1038/530027a.
7
EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.EuroForMix：一款基于连续模型的开源软件，用于评估带有假象的混合样本贡献者的STR DNA图谱。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
8
The interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.单一来源和混合 DNA 图谱的解读。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Sep;7(5):516-28. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.011. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
9
An information gap in DNA evidence interpretation.DNA 证据解读中的信息鸿沟。
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 16;4(12):e8327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008327.
Zotero 插件