Suppr超能文献

医疗保险按服务收费受益人中风后出院回家后的熟练护理和住院康复设施使用情况:COMPASS试验的结果

Skilled Nursing and Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Use by Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Discharged Home After a Stroke: Findings From the COMPASS Trial.

作者信息

Freburger Janet K, Pastva Amy M, Coleman Sylvia W, Peter Kennedy M, Kucharska-Newton Anna M, Johnson Anna M, Psioda Matthew A, Duncan Pamela W, Bushnell Cheryl D, Rosamond Wayne D, Jones Sara B

机构信息

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May;103(5):882-890.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.015. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effect of a comprehensive transitional care model on the use of skilled nursing facility (SNF) and inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) care in the 12 months after acute care discharge home following stroke; and to identify predictors of experiencing a SNF or IRF admission following discharge home after stroke.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized pragmatic trial SETTING: Forty-one acute care hospitals in North Carolina.

PARTICIPANTS

2262 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with transient ischemic attack or stroke discharged home. The sample was 80.3% White and 52.1% female, with a mean (SD) age of 74.9 (10.2) years and a mean ± SD National Institutes of Health stroke scale score of 2.3 (3.7).

INTERVENTION

Comprehensive transitional care model (COMPASS-TC), which consisted of a 2-day follow-up phone call from the postacute care coordinator and 14-day in-person visit with the postacute care coordinator and advanced practice provider.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to first SNF or IRF and SNF or IRF admission (yes/no) in the 12 months following discharge home. All analyses utilized multivariable mixed models including a hospital-specific random effect to account for the non-independence of measures within hospital. Intent to treat analyses using Cox proportional hazards regression assessed the effect of COMPASS-TC on time to SNF/IRF admission. Logistic regression was used to identify clinical and non-clinical predictors of SNF/IRF admission.

RESULTS

Only 34% of patients in the intervention arm received COMPASS-TC per protocol. COMPASS-TC was not associated with a reduced hazard of a SNF/ IRF admission in the 12 months post-discharge (hazard ratio, 1.20, with a range of 0.95-1.52) compared to usual care. This estimate was robust to additional covariate adjustment (hazard ratio, 1.23) (0.93-1.64). Both clinical and non-clinical factors (ie, insurance, geography) were predictors of SNF/IRF use.

CONCLUSIONS

COMPASS-TC was not consistently incorporated into real-world clinical practice. The use of a comprehensive transitional care model for patients discharged home after stroke was not associated with SNF or IRF admissions in a 12-month follow-up period. Non-clinical factors predictive of SNF/IRF use suggest potential issues with access to this type of care.

摘要

目的

研究综合过渡护理模式对卒中后急性护理出院回家后12个月内熟练护理机构(SNF)和住院康复机构(IRF)护理使用情况的影响;并确定卒中后出院回家后入住SNF或IRF的预测因素。

设计

整群随机实用试验

地点

北卡罗来纳州的41家急性护理医院。

参与者

2262名因短暂性脑缺血发作或卒中出院回家的医疗保险按服务收费受益人。样本中80.3%为白人,52.1%为女性,平均(标准差)年龄为74.9(10.2)岁,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表平均得分±标准差为2.3(3.7)。

干预措施

综合过渡护理模式(COMPASS-TC),包括急性后期护理协调员进行的2天随访电话,以及急性后期护理协调员和高级执业提供者进行的14天上门访视。

主要观察指标

出院回家后12个月内首次入住SNF或IRF的时间以及入住SNF或IRF的情况(是/否)。所有分析均采用多变量混合模型,包括医院特定随机效应,以考虑医院内测量值的非独立性。使用Cox比例风险回归进行意向性分析评估COMPASS-TC对入住SNF/IRF时间的影响。使用逻辑回归确定入住SNF/IRF的临床和非临床预测因素。

结果

干预组中只有34%的患者按方案接受了COMPASS-TC。与常规护理相比,COMPASS-TC在出院后12个月内与降低入住SNF/IRF的风险无关(风险比为1.20,范围为0.95-1.52)。该估计值在进行额外协变量调整后仍然稳健(风险比为1.23)(0.93-1.64)。临床和非临床因素(即保险、地理位置)均为入住SNF/IRF的预测因素。

结论

COMPASS-TC未始终如一地纳入实际临床实践。卒中后出院回家的患者使用综合过渡护理模式在12个月的随访期内与入住SNF或IRF无关。预测入住SNF/IRF的非临床因素表明在获得此类护理方面存在潜在问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验