• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节假体感染一期翻修术后败血症失败:微生物学意义。

Septic Failure After One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: Microbiological Implications.

机构信息

Department of Orhopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven - Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):373-378. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.020
PMID:34740790
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The microbiological implications of septic failure after 1-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip remain unclear.

METHODS

Information was gathered on comorbidities, previous procedures, preoperative and postoperative microbiology results, methods of detection, and antibiotic resistance patterns, for all patients, who developed septic failure after 1-stage exchange for PJI of the hip performed at our institution during 2001-2017.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were identified. Septic failure was diagnosed a mean of 1.7 (standard deviation 2.3, range 0-11.8) years later. Although the spectrum of microorganisms was similar to preoperative, in the majority of patients (55%), the initial microorganism(s) was (were) replaced by (a) totally different microorganism(s). Overall, there was a decrease in the number of polymicrobial PJIs. The number of patients with high virulent microorganisms decreased significantly from 52 to 36 (P = .034). The number of PJIs due to gram-negative pathogens remained similar (11 vs 14, P = .491). The number of rifampicin-resistant staphylococci, fluoroquinolone-resistant streptococci, enterococci, and fungi changed from 8 to 15, 0 to 2, 7 to 3, and 1 to 2, respectively, but these changes did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The majority of reinfections is caused by different infecting bacteria, hence it is essential to perform a new diagnostic workup and not base treatment decisions (solely) on historical cultures. We were furthermore unable to irrefutably prove that, from a microbiological point of view, septic failure after 1-stage exchange comes with increased challenges. Given the time interval to failure, we propose that a longer follow-up of these patients is needed, than previously suggested.

摘要

背景

髋关节一期翻修治疗假体关节感染(PJI)后发生败血症失败的微生物学意义尚不清楚。

方法

收集了 2001-2017 年在我院行髋关节一期翻修治疗 PJI 后发生败血症失败的所有患者的合并症、既往手术、术前和术后微生物学结果、检测方法和抗生素耐药模式等信息。

结果

共确定了 77 例患者。败血症失败的平均诊断时间为 1.7 年(标准差 2.3 年,范围 0-11.8 年)。尽管微生物群谱与术前相似,但在大多数患者(55%)中,最初的微生物(s)被(a)完全不同的微生物(s)取代。总的来说,多微生物 PJI 的数量减少了。高毒力微生物的患者数量从 52 例显著减少至 36 例(P =.034)。革兰氏阴性病原体引起的 PJI 数量保持不变(11 例比 14 例,P =.491)。耐利福平的葡萄球菌、氟喹诺酮耐药链球菌、肠球菌和真菌的数量分别从 8 例增加至 15 例、0 例增加至 2 例、7 例增加至 3 例和 1 例增加至 2 例,但这些变化没有统计学意义。

结论

大多数再感染是由不同的感染细菌引起的,因此必须进行新的诊断性检查,而不能仅基于历史培养物来做出治疗决策。此外,我们无法无可争议地证明,从微生物学角度来看,一期翻修后发生败血症失败会带来更大的挑战。鉴于失败的时间间隔,我们建议需要对这些患者进行更长时间的随访,比之前建议的时间更长。

相似文献

1
Septic Failure After One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip: Microbiological Implications.髋关节假体感染一期翻修术后败血症失败:微生物学意义。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):373-378. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
2
What is the rate of reinfection with different and difficult-to-treat bacteria after failed one-stage septic knee exchange?一期感染性膝关节置换失败后,不同且难以治疗的细菌再次感染的发生率是多少?
Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):687-695. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05291-z. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
3
Oral Therapy, Microbiological Findings, and Comorbidity Influence the Outcome of Prosthetic Joint Infections Undergoing 2-Stage Exchange.口服治疗、微生物学检查结果及合并症对接受两阶段翻修的人工关节感染治疗结果的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2239-2243. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.057. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
4
Are Sonication Cultures of Antibiotic Cement Spacers Useful During Second-stage Reimplantation Surgery for Prosthetic Joint Infection?抗生素骨水泥间隔器的超声培养物在人工关节感染二期翻修术中是否有用?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):1986-1992. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000257.
5
A spacer infection by Candida albicans secondary to a Staphylococcus capitis prosthetic joint infection: a case report.白色念珠菌引起的假丝酵母菌 spacer 感染继发于表皮葡萄球菌人工关节感染:一例报告。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;21(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06113-8.
6
Preoperative joint aspiration culture results and causative pathogens in total hip and knee prosthesis infections: mind the gap.关节置换术前关节液抽吸培养结果与假体感染的病原菌:注意差异。
Acta Clin Belg. 2020 Aug;75(4):284-292. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2019.1611718. Epub 2019 May 5.
7
Repeat two-stage exchange arthroplasty for prosthetic hip re-infection.重复双阶段髋关节置换术治疗人工髋关节假体感染。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Sep;100-B(9):1157-1161. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B9.BJJ-2018-0470.R1.
8
Ten-Year Results Following One-Stage Septic Hip Exchange in the Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.一期感染性髋关节置换术治疗人工关节周围感染的十年结果
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1221-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
9
Failure of the first step of two-stage revision due to polymicrobial prosthetic joint infection of the hip.髋关节多微生物假体关节感染导致两阶段翻修术第一步失败。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2016 Dec;17(4):369-376. doi: 10.1007/s10195-016-0417-8. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
10
Microbiological pattern of prosthetic hip and knee infections: a high-volume, single-centre experience in China.中国一家大容量单中心医院假体髋关节和膝关节感染的微生物学模式。
J Med Microbiol. 2021 Mar;70(3). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001305. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is the Most Reliable Concordance Rate of Preoperative Synovial Fluid Aspiration and Intraoperative Biopsy to Detect Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Knee, Hip and Shoulder Arthroplasty?在膝关节、髋关节和肩关节置换术中,术前滑膜液抽吸和术中活检检测假体周围关节感染的最可靠符合率是多少?
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Sep 25;12(10):1482. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101482.
2
Characterizing recurrent infections after one-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee: a systematic review of the literature.一期翻修治疗膝关节假体周围感染后复发性感染的特征:文献系统评价。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2703-2715. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03480-7. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Does the Use of Local Antibiotics Affect Clinical Outcome of Patients with Fracture-Related Infection?
局部使用抗生素会影响骨折相关感染患者的临床结局吗?
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 29;11(10):1330. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101330.
4
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin Continuous Infusion in Patients Treated at Home in an Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Program.门诊肠外抗菌治疗项目中在家接受治疗的患者万古霉素持续输注的临床疗效与安全性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 23;11(5):702. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050702.
5
What is the rate of reinfection with different and difficult-to-treat bacteria after failed one-stage septic knee exchange?一期感染性膝关节置换失败后,不同且难以治疗的细菌再次感染的发生率是多少?
Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):687-695. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05291-z. Epub 2022 Jan 4.