Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):1082-1088.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.040. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
Females represent a group of patients with higher mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), endovascular (EVAR), or open surgical (OSR), repair. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the 30-day mortality after AAA repair in females, comparing both EVAR and OSR, in elective and urgent settings.
The protocol of the review was registered to the PROSPERO database (CRD42021242686). A search of the English literature was conducted, using PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases, from inception to March 5, 2021, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines (PRISMA). Only studies reporting on 30-day mortality of AAA repair, in urgent and elective settings, comparing EVAR and OSR, in the female population were eligible. Patients were stratified according to the need for elective or urgent repair. Symptomatic and ruptured cases were included into the urgent group. Individual studies were assessed for risk of bias using the (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) ROBINS-I tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after AAA repair in the female population, comparing EVAR and OSR. The outcomes were summarized as odds ratio, along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), through a paired meta-analysis.
Eight studies reported data on 30-day mortality following AAA repair. A total of 56,982 females (22,995 EVAR vs 33,987 OSR) were included. A significantly reduced total 30-day mortality rate was recorded among females that underwent EVAR compared with OSR (odds ratio [OR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.23-0.27; P < .001; Ι = 86%). In addition, a reduced 30-day mortality was found in females that underwent elective EVAR compared with OSR (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.33-0.41; P < .001; Ι = 48%). Despite the fact that OSR was more frequently offered in the urgent setting (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.19-0.23; P < .001; Ι = 84%), EVAR was associated with a reduced 30-day mortality (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.57; P < .001; Ι = 0%).
In females, EVAR is associated with lower 30-day mortality in both elective and urgent AAA repair, although it appears as less likely to be offered in the setting of urgent AAA repair.
女性在腹主动脉瘤(AAA)、血管内(EVAR)或开放手术(OSR)修复后死亡率更高,是一组特殊的患者群体。本系统评价旨在评估女性 AAA 修复术后 30 天死亡率,比较 EVAR 和 OSR 在择期和紧急情况下的死亡率。
本综述的方案已在 PROSPERO 数据库(CRD42021242686)中注册。使用 PubMed、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 数据库,按照系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选条目(PRISMA)指南,从成立到 2021 年 3 月 5 日进行了英文文献检索。只有报告了 AAA 修复术后 30 天死亡率的研究,在紧急和择期情况下,比较 EVAR 和 OSR,在女性人群中是合格的。根据紧急或择期修复的需要,对患者进行分层。有症状和破裂的病例被归入紧急组。使用(非随机干预措施的风险偏倚评估)ROBINS-I 工具对个别研究进行风险偏倚评估。使用推荐评估、制定与评价分级(GRADE)方法评估证据质量。主要结局是女性人群中 AAA 修复术后 30 天死亡率,比较 EVAR 和 OSR。通过配对荟萃分析,将结局总结为比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。
有 8 项研究报告了 AAA 修复后 30 天死亡率的数据。共纳入 56982 名女性(22995 名 EVAR 与 33987 名 OSR)。接受 EVAR 的女性总 30 天死亡率明显低于 OSR(OR,0.25;95%CI,0.23-0.27;P<.001;I²=86%)。此外,接受择期 EVAR 的女性 30 天死亡率也低于 OSR(OR,0.37;95%CI,0.33-0.41;P<.001;I²=48%)。尽管 OSR 更常应用于紧急情况下(OR,0.21;95%CI,0.19-0.23;P<.001;I²=84%),但 EVAR 与降低的 30 天死亡率相关(OR,0.48;95%CI,0.40-0.57;P<.001;I²=0%)。
在女性中,EVAR 与择期和紧急 AAA 修复后的 30 天死亡率降低相关,尽管它在紧急 AAA 修复中不太可能被应用。