Internal Medicine, US Army Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Emerg Med J. 2022 Dec;39(12):882-887. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210802. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
We sought to evaluate the effect of adult procedural sedation on cerebral oxygenation measured by near-infrared spectroscopy (rSo levels), and to assess whether respiratory depression occurring during procedural sedation was associated with decreases in cerebral oxygenation.
We performed a prospective, observational preliminary study on a convenience sample of adult patients (>18 years) undergoing unscheduled procedural sedation in the ED from August 2017 to September 2018 at Hennepin County Medical Center in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The primary outcome measures were rSo values by level of sedation achieved and the incidence of cerebral hypoxaemia during procedural sedation (absolute rSo ≤60 or decrease ≥20% from baseline). The secondary outcome is the decrease in rSo during episodes of respiratory adverse events (AEs), defined by respiratory depression requiring supportive airway measures.
We enrolled 100 patients (53% female). The median (IQR) rSo values (%) by each level of sedation achieved on the Observer Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (OAAS) scale 1-5, respectively, were 74 (69-79), 74 (70-79), 74 (69-79), 75 (69-80), 72 (68-76). The incidence of cerebral hypoxaemia at any point within the sedation (absolute rSo <60%) was 10/100 (10%); 2 out of 10 had rSo reduction more than 20% from baseline value; the median (IQR) observed minimum rSo in these patients was 58 (56-59). We observed respiratory depression in 65 patients via standard monitoring; of these, 39 (60%) required at least one supportive airway measure, meeting the definition of a respiratory AE. During these AEs, 15% (6/39) demonstrated cerebral hypoxaemia with a median (IQR) minimum rSo of 58 (57-59). Four patients (4%) had cerebral hypoxaemia without a respiratory AE.
Cerebral oximetry may represent a useful tool for procedural sedation safety research to detect potential subclinical changes that may be associated with risk, but appears neither sensitive nor specific for routine use in clinical practice.
我们旨在评估成人程序镇静对近红外光谱(rSo 水平)测量的脑氧合的影响,并评估程序镇静期间发生的呼吸抑制是否与脑氧合降低有关。
我们在 2017 年 8 月至 2018 年 9 月期间,在明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市亨内平县医疗中心对接受非计划程序镇静的成年患者(>18 岁)进行了一项前瞻性、观察性初步研究。主要结局指标为达到镇静水平时的 rSo 值和程序镇静期间脑缺氧的发生率(绝对 rSo ≤60 或与基线相比降低≥20%)。次要结局是呼吸不良事件(AE)期间 rSo 的降低,定义为需要支持性气道措施的呼吸抑制。
我们纳入了 100 例患者(53%为女性)。根据 Observer Assessment of Alertness and Sedation(OAAS)量表达到的镇静水平 1-5,中位数(IQR)rSo 值(%)分别为 74(69-79)、74(70-79)、74(69-79)、75(69-80)、72(68-76)。在镇静过程中的任何时间,脑缺氧的发生率(绝对 rSo<60%)为 10/100(10%);10 例中有 2 例 rSo 比基线值降低超过 20%;这 2 例患者观察到的最低 rSo 值中位数为 58(56-59)。我们通过标准监测发现 65 例患者存在呼吸抑制;其中 39 例(60%)需要至少一种支持性气道措施,符合呼吸 AE 的定义。在这些 AE 中,15%(6/39)表现出脑缺氧,最低 rSo 值中位数为 58(57-59)。4 例(4%)患者发生脑缺氧,但无呼吸 AE。
脑氧合监测可能是程序镇静安全性研究中有用的工具,可用于检测潜在的亚临床变化,这些变化可能与风险有关,但在临床实践中似乎既不敏感也不特异。