Rodriguez Stephanie, Mangipudi Sowmya, Pomy Benjamin J, Nguyen Bao-Ngoc, Sidawy Anton N, Amdur Richard L, Lala Salim, Macsata Robyn
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;81:308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.046. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
Numerous angiography-based peripheral arterial disease classification schemes have been developed to stratify severity of preoperative patient disease, but few studies have correlated angiography-based anatomic classification schemes to postoperative outcomes. This study examined whether a proposed pre-operative angiography scoring system was predictive of outcomes after isolated common femoral endarterectomy with profundaplasty (CFEP).
A retrospective review was conducted of patients treated with isolated CFEP for claudication and/or rest pain at a single institution from 2016-19. Pre-operative angiograms were assessed quantitatively by 4 blinded surgeons across 3 domains: profunda stenosis, profunda disease length, and outflow disease severity. Table I describes the proposed angiography scoring system. Internal consistency reliability of rater scores was calculated using Cronbach alpha. Outcomes included clinical improvement, further interventions, major amputations, mortality, and mean increase in ankle-brachial index (ABI) at 30 days, and 6 months. McNemar tests, between-group t-tests, Pearson correlations, and linear regression were used.
Clinical Outcomes 88% of patients (n = 22) had clinical improvement at 30 days; the remaining 12% of patients (n = 3) required further interventions. One patient (4%) required major amputation between 30 days and 6 months for recurrence of rest pain that had initially resolved after isolated CFEP. There was 0% mortality during the study period. Mean ABI increased by 0.15 ± 0.21 at 30 days, and by 0.06 ± 0.21 at 6 months. Angiography Scoring System Profunda stenosis score was associated with clinical improvement at 6 months (P = 0.04). A profunda stenosis score of ≥2.6 was strongly associated with 6-month clinical improvement (64% of those ≥ 2.6 improved, versus 15% of those <2.6, P = 0.15). Profunda stenosis score was associated with ABI improvement at 30 days (r = 0.73, P = 0.01) and 6 months (r = 0.82, P = 0.007). Profunda disease length score was associated with clinical improvement at 30 days (P = 0.002). 100% of patients with a profunda disease length score of ≥1.5 clinically improved at 30 days, versus 67% of those with <1.5 (P = 0.04). Angiography scores were not found to be associated with further intervention, major amputation, or mortality. Cronbach alpha for profunda stenosis, profunda disease length, and outflow severity scores were 0.90, 0.90, and 0.79, respectively, indicating strong internal consistency.
This institutional angiography scoring system successfully predicts clinical improvement following CFEP. Higher profunda stenosis and profunda disease length scores were most predictive of operative success within 6 months. Future validation studies will investigate these outcomes in a larger population, and over a longer period.
已经开发出许多基于血管造影的外周动脉疾病分类方案,用于对术前患者疾病的严重程度进行分层,但很少有研究将基于血管造影的解剖分类方案与术后结果相关联。本研究探讨了一种提议的术前血管造影评分系统是否能预测单纯股总动脉内膜切除术加股深动脉成形术(CFEP)后的结果。
对2016年至2019年在单一机构接受单纯CFEP治疗间歇性跛行和/或静息痛的患者进行回顾性研究。4名 blinded 外科医生对术前血管造影进行了3个方面的定量评估:股深动脉狭窄、股深动脉病变长度和流出道疾病严重程度。表I描述了提议的血管造影评分系统。使用Cronbach alpha计算评分者评分的内部一致性可靠性。结果包括临床改善、进一步干预、大截肢、死亡率以及30天和6个月时踝肱指数(ABI)的平均增加。使用了McNemar检验、组间t检验、Pearson相关性分析和线性回归分析。
临床结果 88%的患者(n = 22)在30天时临床改善;其余12%的患者(n = 3)需要进一步干预。1名患者(4%)在30天至6个月期间因最初在单纯CFEP后缓解的静息痛复发而需要进行大截肢。研究期间死亡率为0%。30天时ABI平均增加0.15±0.21,6个月时增加0.06±0.21。血管造影评分系统 股深动脉狭窄评分与6个月时的临床改善相关(P = )。股深动脉狭窄评分≥2.6与6个月时的临床改善密切相关(≥2.6的患者中有64%改善,而<2.6的患者中为15%,P = 0.15)。股深动脉狭窄评分与30天(r = 0.73,P = 0.01)和6个月(r = 0.82,P = 0)时的ABI改善相关。股深动脉病变长度评分与30天时的临床改善相关(P = 0.002)。股深动脉病变长度评分≥1.5的患者在30天时100%临床改善,而<1.5的患者中为67%(P = 0.04))。未发现血管造影评分与进一步干预、大截肢或死亡率相关。股深动脉狭窄、股深动脉病变长度和流出道严重程度评分的Cronbach alpha分别为0.90、0.90和0.79,表明内部一致性强。
这种机构血管造影评分系统成功预测了CFEP后的临床改善。较高的股深动脉狭窄和股深动脉病变长度评分最能预测6个月内的手术成功。未来的验证研究将在更大的人群中、更长的时间内研究这些结果。