Sultana Shamima, Hitomi Takefumi, Daifu Kobayashi Masako, Shimotake Akihiro, Matsuhashi Masao, Takahashi Ryosuke, Ikeda Akio
Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 22;15:748893. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.748893. eCollection 2021.
To clarify whether long time constant (TC) is useful for detecting the after-slow activity of epileptiform discharges (EDs): sharp waves and spikes and for differentiating EDs from sharp transients (Sts). We employed 68 after-slow activities preceded by 32 EDs (26 sharp waves and six spikes) and 36 Sts from 52 patients with partial and generalized epilepsy (22 men, 30 women; mean age 39.08 ± 13.13 years) defined by visual inspection. High-frequency activity (HFA) associated with the apical component of EDs and Sts was also investigated to endorse two groups. After separating nine Sts that were labeled by visual inspection but did not fulfill the amplitude criteria for after-slow of Sts, 59 activities (32 EDs and 27 Sts) were analyzed about the total area of after-slow under three TCs (long: 2 s; conventional: 0.3 s; and short: 0.1 s). Compared to Sts, HFA was found significantly more with the apical component of EDs ( < 0.05). The total area of after-slow in all 32 EDs under TC 2 s was significantly larger than those under TC 0.3 s and 0.1 s ( < 0.001). Conversely, no significant differences were observed in the same parameter of 27 Sts among the three different TCs. Regarding separated nine Sts, the total area of after-slow showed a similar tendency to that of 27 Sts under three different TCs. These results suggest that long TC could be useful for selectively endorsing after-slow of EDs and differentiating EDs from Sts. These findings are concordant with the results of the HFA analysis. Visual inspection is also equally good as the total area of after-slow analysis.
为了阐明长时间常数(TC)是否有助于检测癫痫样放电(EDs)的慢后活动:尖波、棘波以及用于区分EDs与尖形瞬变(Sts)。我们采用了来自52例部分性和全身性癫痫患者(22例男性,30例女性;平均年龄39.08±13.13岁)的68次慢后活动,这些慢后活动之前有32次EDs(26次尖波和6次棘波)以及36次Sts,通过视觉检查进行定义。还研究了与EDs和Sts的顶端成分相关的高频活动(HFA)以区分这两组。在分离出9次经视觉检查标记但不符合Sts慢后幅度标准的Sts后,对59次活动(32次EDs和27次Sts)在三个TC(长:2秒;传统:0.3秒;短:0.1秒)下的慢后总面积进行了分析。与Sts相比,发现EDs的顶端成分中HFA明显更多(<0.05)。在2秒TC下所有32次EDs的慢后总面积明显大于0.3秒和0.1秒TC下的慢后总面积(<0.001)。相反,在27次Sts的相同参数中,三种不同TC之间未观察到显著差异。对于分离出的9次Sts,在三种不同TC下慢后总面积显示出与27次Sts相似的趋势。这些结果表明,长TC可能有助于选择性地识别EDs的慢后活动并区分EDs与Sts。这些发现与HFA分析的结果一致。视觉检查与慢后总面积分析同样有效。