• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对急性卒中后非抑郁患者运动恢复的疗效及耐受性:一项荟萃分析

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Motor Recovery in Non-depressed Patients After Acute Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Su Ning, Wen Changming, Guo Shiqian, Yu Yang, Wang Chenglin

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 20;12:749322. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.749322. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2021.749322
PMID:34744985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8564176/
Abstract

To explore the efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for motor recovery in non-depressed patients after acute stroke. According to the predefined retrieval strategy, multiple electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria. The primary efficacy outcome was measured by Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale (FMMS) score and the indicators of tolerability included withdrawal rate and the incidence of adverse events (AEs). 10RCTs were included, the pooled analyses showed patients who received fluoxetine (endpoint: MD = 21.17, 95% CI 14.13-28.21, < 0.00001; mean change: MD = 16.27, 95% CI 10.05-22.50, < 0.00001) and citalopram (endpoint: MD = 22.93, 95% CI 11.13-34.73, = 0.0001; mean change: MD = 24.06, 95% CI 10.47-37.65, = 0.0005) experienced greater improvement in FMMS score. There was no evident difference in total withdrawal rate (fluoxetine: OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.90-1.27, = 1.38; citalopram: OR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.28, = 0.71; escitalopram: OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.58-1.28, = 0.47) between two groups. Besides, the incidence of hyponatremia (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.16-3.50, = 0.01), seizure (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.03-2.08, = 0.04) and fracture (OR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.61-3.40, < 0.00001) in the fluoxetine group was higher than in the placebo group. Fluoxetine and citalopram can promote motor recovery in non-depressed patients with acute stroke, but it is necessary to pay attention to the possible AEs of fluoxetine, such as hyponatremia, seizure and fracture. PROSPERO, identifier [CRD42021227452].

摘要

探讨选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)对急性卒中后非抑郁患者运动功能恢复的疗效及耐受性。根据预先设定的检索策略,检索多个电子数据库,查找符合纳入标准的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要疗效指标采用Fugl-Meyer运动量表(FMMS)评分,耐受性指标包括撤药率和不良事件(AE)发生率。共纳入10项RCT,汇总分析显示,接受氟西汀治疗的患者(终点:MD = 21.17,95%CI 14.13 - 28.21,P < 0.00001;平均变化:MD = 16.27,95%CI 10.05 - 22.50,P < 0.00001)和西酞普兰治疗的患者(终点:MD = 22.93,95%CI 11.13 - 34.73,P = 0.0001;平均变化:MD = 24.06,95%CI 10.47 - 37.65,P = 0.0005)在FMMS评分上有更大改善。两组的总撤药率无明显差异(氟西汀:OR = 1.11,95%CI 0.90 - 1.27,P = 1.38;西酞普兰:OR = 0.94,95%CI 0.69 - 1.28,P = 0.71;艾司西酞普兰:OR = 0.87,95%CI 0.58 - 1.28,P = 0.47)。此外,氟西汀组低钠血症(OR = 2.01,95%CI 1.16 - 3.50,P = 0.01)、癫痫(OR = 1.46,95%CI 1.03 - 2.08,P = 0.04)和骨折(OR = 2.34,95%CI 1.61 - 3.40,P < 0.00001)的发生率高于安慰剂组。氟西汀和西酞普兰可促进急性卒中非抑郁患者的运动功能恢复,但有必要关注氟西汀可能的不良事件,如低钠血症、癫痫和骨折。国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO),标识符[CRD42021227452]

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/fd2a7852d7ec/fneur-12-749322-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/91605fdb5e87/fneur-12-749322-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/4b9b92d08ca1/fneur-12-749322-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/6e60d273e322/fneur-12-749322-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/cdd99e66a597/fneur-12-749322-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/02e47ecb9b7f/fneur-12-749322-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/215456a90702/fneur-12-749322-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/5193bfb09d60/fneur-12-749322-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/fd2a7852d7ec/fneur-12-749322-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/91605fdb5e87/fneur-12-749322-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/4b9b92d08ca1/fneur-12-749322-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/6e60d273e322/fneur-12-749322-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/cdd99e66a597/fneur-12-749322-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/02e47ecb9b7f/fneur-12-749322-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/215456a90702/fneur-12-749322-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/5193bfb09d60/fneur-12-749322-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cba4/8564176/fd2a7852d7ec/fneur-12-749322-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
The Efficacy and Tolerability of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Motor Recovery in Non-depressed Patients After Acute Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对急性卒中后非抑郁患者运动恢复的疗效及耐受性:一项荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 20;12:749322. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.749322. eCollection 2021.
2
The efficacy and safety of fluoxetine versus placebo for stroke recovery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.氟西汀对比安慰剂治疗脑卒中恢复期的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug;45(4):839-846. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01573-1. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
3
Safety and Efficacy of SSRIs in Improving Poststroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.SSRIs 在改善脑卒中后恢复中的安全性和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 5;11(13):e025868. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025868. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Risk of Fractures in Stroke Patients Treated With a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗的脑卒中患者骨折风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2021 Aug;52(9):2802-2808. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032973. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
5
The efficacy comparison of citalopram, fluoxetine, and placebo on motor recovery after ischemic stroke: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial.西酞普兰、氟西汀和安慰剂对缺血性脑卒中后运动功能恢复的疗效比较:一项双盲安慰剂对照随机对照试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Aug;32(8):1069-1075. doi: 10.1177/0269215518777791. Epub 2018 May 21.
6
Recovery in Stroke Patients Treated With Fluoxetine Versus Placebo: A Pooled Analysis of 7,165 Patients.氟西汀与安慰剂治疗中风患者的康复效果比较:7165 例患者的汇总分析。
Neurologist. 2023 Mar 1;28(2):104-116. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0000000000000451.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on promoting motor recovery after stroke:meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对促进中风后运动恢复的疗效及耐受性:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Expert Rev Neurother. 2021 Oct;21(10):1179-1189. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1982696. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
8
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for functional independence and depression prevention in early stage of post-stroke: A meta-analysis.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对脑卒中后早期功能独立性及预防抑郁的作用:一项荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(6):e19062. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019062.
9
Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial.氟西汀治疗急性缺血性脑卒中后运动功能恢复(FLAME):一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Feb;10(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70314-8. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
10
Effect of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors on Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Meta-analysis.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对脑卒中后运动功能恢复的影响:系统荟萃分析。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec 1;102(12):1097-1101. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002289. Epub 2023 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of Fractures in Stroke Patients Treated With a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗的脑卒中患者骨折风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2021 Aug;52(9):2802-2808. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032973. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
Safety and efficacy of fluoxetine on functional recovery after acute stroke (EFFECTS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.氟西汀对急性脑卒中后功能恢复的安全性和疗效(EFFECTS):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Aug;19(8):661-669. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30219-2.
3
Safety and efficacy of fluoxetine on functional outcome after acute stroke (AFFINITY): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
氟西汀对急性脑卒中后功能结局的安全性和疗效(AFFINITY):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Aug;19(8):651-660. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30207-6.
4
Prevalence of human alveolar echinococcosis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中国人体泡型包虫病的流行情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):1105. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08989-8.
5
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for functional independence and depression prevention in early stage of post-stroke: A meta-analysis.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对脑卒中后早期功能独立性及预防抑郁的作用:一项荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(6):e19062. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019062.
6
Time is of the essence when treating necrotizing soft tissue infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.治疗坏死性软组织感染时时间至关重要:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Jan 8;15:4. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0286-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute intracerebral hemorrhage, the FMRICH trial.氟西汀治疗急性脑出血后运动功能恢复:FMRICH 试验。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Mar;190:105656. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105656. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
8
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery.用于中风康复的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 26;2019(11):CD009286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009286.pub3.
9
Study on Dalfampridine in the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis Mobility Disability: A meta-analysis.关于达拉非尼治疗多发性硬化症运动障碍的研究:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 12;14(9):e0222288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222288. eCollection 2019.
10
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家卒中负担,1990-2016 年:2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):439-458. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. Epub 2019 Mar 11.