Mills Kristen J, Lawlor Jennifer A, Neal Jennifer Watling, Neal Zachary P, McAlindon Kathryn
Michigan State University.
Evid Policy. 2020 Aug;16(3):337-358. doi: 10.1332/174426419x15468576296175.
This study draws on two communities theory to address two major research questions related conceptions of research in educational practice and policy. First, how do educators conceptualize research? Second, to what extent do educators' conceptions of research align with recent U.S. federal educational policies? We conducted 90 semi-structured interviews with educators in the United States, asking them what comes to mind when they think of research. We used open, axial, and selective coding to characterize educators' conceptions of research. We also compared educators' conceptions of research to two U.S. federal educational policies that define scientifically based research and evidence-based interventions. Findings indicate that educators and policies defined research in similar ways, but each included some unique characteristics. Implications from the study include the need for increased communication between federal policy-makers and educators and improved reporting by researchers to better attend to the needs of educators and policymakers.
本研究借鉴双社区理论来解决与教育实践和政策中的研究观念相关的两个主要研究问题。第一,教育工作者如何将研究概念化?第二,教育工作者的研究观念在多大程度上与美国近期的联邦教育政策相一致?我们对美国的教育工作者进行了90次半结构化访谈,询问他们在想到研究时脑海中浮现的内容。我们使用开放式编码、轴心式编码和选择性编码来描述教育工作者的研究观念。我们还将教育工作者的研究观念与两项定义了基于科学的研究和基于证据的干预措施的美国联邦教育政策进行了比较。研究结果表明,教育工作者和政策以相似的方式定义研究,但各自都包含一些独特的特征。该研究的启示包括联邦政策制定者和教育工作者之间需要加强沟通,以及研究人员需要改进报告,以便更好地满足教育工作者和政策制定者的需求。