• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2020年欧洲新冠疫情流行病学及公共卫生应对情况综述

Review of COVID-19 epidemiology and public health response in Europe in 2020.

作者信息

Nanda Mehak, Sharma Rajesh

机构信息

University School of Management and Entrepreneurship, Delhi Technological University, Vivek Vihar, Phase-2, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021 Oct-Dec;12:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100882. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100882
PMID:34746513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8556869/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study focuses on the epidemiology of COVID-19 in Europe and investigates public health response in severely hit countries.

METHODS

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker and Health System Response Monitor were referred. The relationship between stringency index and COVID-19 cases, and between speed of stringency implementation and growth of cases was examined using linear regression.

RESULTS

The case-fatality ratio (CFR) of Europe (2.35%) was higher than the global CFR (2.2%). United Kingdom, Russia, France, Italy, Spain, and Germany together, accounted for 61.15% of cases and 65.62% of deaths in Europe. Significant relationship was observed between growth of COVID-19 cases and late substantive stringency imposed by countries. Population aged 65 and above (r = 0.9037, p < 0.01) and male population (r = 0.8701, p < 0.01) were significantly and positively correlated with COVID-19 deaths. The public health system of even big European countries encountered roadblocks, such as shortages of healthcare resources and deferral of non-COVID-19 treatments while dealing with the unprecedented pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Even big and richest European countries delayed the implementation of non-pharmaceutical interventions which led to rapid virus transmission. The pandemic has posed a reminder to make the public health system more resilient, as epidemics and pandemics of this nature will continue to threaten in future as well.

摘要

目的

本研究聚焦于欧洲新冠肺炎的流行病学,并调查疫情严重国家的公共卫生应对措施。

方法

参考了欧洲疾病预防与控制中心、牛津大学新冠肺炎政府应对追踪器和卫生系统应对监测器的数据。使用线性回归分析了严格指数与新冠肺炎病例之间的关系,以及严格措施实施速度与病例增长之间的关系。

结果

欧洲的病死率(2.35%)高于全球病死率(2.2%)。英国、俄罗斯、法国、意大利、西班牙和德国合计占欧洲病例的61.15%和死亡的65.62%。观察到新冠肺炎病例增长与各国后期实施的实质性严格措施之间存在显著关系。65岁及以上人群(r = 0.9037,p < 0.01)和男性人群(r = 0.8701,p < 0.01)与新冠肺炎死亡显著正相关。即使是欧洲大国的公共卫生系统在应对这一前所未有的疫情时也遇到了障碍,如医疗资源短缺和非新冠肺炎治疗的推迟。

结论

即使是欧洲的大国和最富裕国家也推迟了非药物干预措施的实施,这导致了病毒的快速传播。这场疫情提醒人们要让公共卫生系统更具韧性,因为这种性质的流行病和大流行在未来仍将继续构成威胁。

相似文献

1
Review of COVID-19 epidemiology and public health response in Europe in 2020.2020年欧洲新冠疫情流行病学及公共卫生应对情况综述
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021 Oct-Dec;12:100882. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100882. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
2
A comparison of coronavirus disease 2019 and seasonal influenza surveillance in five European countries: France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom.比较五个欧洲国家(法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国)的 2019 年冠状病毒病和季节性流感监测情况。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2022 May;16(3):417-428. doi: 10.1111/irv.12941. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
3
Effect of heat and humidity on the incidence and mortality due to COVID-19 pandemic in European countries.热湿对欧洲国家 COVID-19 大流行发病率和死亡率的影响。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Sep;24(17):9216-9225. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202009_22874.
4
[COVID-19, neoliberalism and health systems in 30 european countries: relationship to deceases.].[COVID-19、新自由主义与30个欧洲国家的卫生系统:与死亡的关系。]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2020 Oct 28;94:e202010140.
5
Monitoring European data with prospective space-time scan statistics: predicting and evaluating emerging clusters of COVID-19 in European countries.利用前瞻性时空扫描统计监测欧洲数据:预测和评估欧洲国家 COVID-19 新出现的集群。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):2183. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14298-z.
6
Changes in the incidence of invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis during the COVID-19 pandemic in 26 countries and territories in the Invasive Respiratory Infection Surveillance Initiative: a prospective analysis of surveillance data.在 26 个国家和地区的侵袭性呼吸道感染监测倡议中,COVID-19 大流行期间肺炎链球菌、流感嗜血杆菌和脑膜炎奈瑟菌引起的侵袭性疾病发病率的变化:监测数据的前瞻性分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jun;3(6):e360-e370. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00077-7.
7
Utility of the Comprehensive Health and Stringency Indexes in Evaluating Government Responses for Containing the Spread of COVID-19 in India: Ecological Time-Series Study.综合健康与严格指数在评估印度政府控制新冠疫情传播措施中的效用:生态时间序列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Feb 10;9:e38371. doi: 10.2196/38371.
8
The stringency of the containment measures in response to COVID-19 inversely correlates with the overall disease occurrence over the epidemic wave.针对 COVID-19 的遏制措施的严格程度与疫情波期间的总疾病发生率呈反比。
Bratisl Lek Listy. 2022;123(9):601-617. doi: 10.4149/BLL_2022_098.
9
Policy stringency and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of data from 15 countries.政策严格程度与新冠大流行期间的心理健康:来自 15 个国家的纵向数据分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 May;7(5):e417-e426. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00060-3. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
10
Scrutiny of COVID-19 response strategies among severely affected European nations.对受影响严重的欧洲国家应对新冠疫情策略的审查。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2021 Aug;12(4):203-214. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2021.0068. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of the epidemiology of pediatric autoimmune encephalitis: disease burden and clinical decision-making.小儿自身免疫性脑炎流行病学的系统评价:疾病负担与临床决策
Front Neurol. 2024 Jul 2;15:1408606. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1408606. eCollection 2024.
2
Risk of severe COVID-19 in unvaccinated patients during the period from wild-type to Omicron variant: real-world evidence from Japan.未接种疫苗患者在野生型至奥密克戎变异期间患重症 COVID-19 的风险:来自日本的真实世界证据。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2024;29:10. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.23-00274.
3
Worsened self-rated health in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic among older adults in Europe.

本文引用的文献

1
Europe's essential workers: Migration and pandemic politics in Central and Eastern Europe during COVID-19.欧洲的关键工作者:新冠疫情期间中东欧的移民与疫情政治
Eur Policy Anal. 2020 Dec;6(2):238-263. doi: 10.1002/epa2.1105. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
2
A Review of Patient Satisfaction and Experience with Telemedicine: A Virtual Solution During and Beyond COVID-19 Pandemic.远程医疗在新冠疫情期间和之后的应用:患者满意度和体验的回顾。
Telemed J E Health. 2021 Dec;27(12):1325-1331. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0570. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
COVID-19: A Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology and Public Health System Response in Nordic Region.
在欧洲,COVID-19 大流行期间老年人自我评估健康状况恶化。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Dec 9;33(6):1148-1154. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad143.
4
Response to COVID-19 in Lebanon: update, challenges and lessons learned.黎巴嫩应对 COVID-19 的情况:更新、挑战和经验教训。
Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Jan 16;151:e23. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823000067.
5
The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the incidence of diseases and the provision of primary care: A registry-based study.Covid-19 大流行对疾病发病率和初级保健服务的影响:基于登记的研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0271049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271049. eCollection 2022.
COVID-19:北欧地区的流行病学和公共卫生系统应对全面综述。
Int J Health Serv. 2021 Jul;51(3):287-299. doi: 10.1177/0020731421994840. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
4
Updated rapid risk assessment from ECDC on the risk related to the spread of new SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern in the EU/EEA - first update.欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)关于欧盟/欧洲经济区(EEA)新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变异毒株传播相关风险的最新快速风险评估——首次更新。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jan;26(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.3.2101211.
5
Trading Health for Wealth: The Effect of COVID-19 Response Stringency.用健康换财富:新冠疫情应对力度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 24;17(23):8725. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238725.
6
COVID-19 mortality risk for older men and women.COVID-19 对老年男性和女性的死亡率风险。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 19;20(1):1742. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09826-8.
7
Coronavirus disease 2019 and gender-related mortality in European countries: A meta-analysis.2019 年冠状病毒病与欧洲国家的性别相关死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Maturitas. 2020 Nov;141:59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.06.017. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
An Assessment on Impact of COVID-19 Infection in a Gender Specific Manner.以性别为基础评估 COVID-19 感染的影响。
Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2021 Feb;17(1):94-112. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10048-z. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Coronavirus: Why Men are More Vulnerable to Covid-19 Than Women?冠状病毒:为何男性比女性更容易感染新冠病毒?
SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2(7):874-876. doi: 10.1007/s42399-020-00341-w. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
10
Sex Differences in Mortality From COVID-19 Pandemic: Are Men Vulnerable and Women Protected?COVID-19大流行导致的死亡中的性别差异:男性易受影响而女性受到保护吗?
JACC Case Rep. 2020 Jul 15;2(9):1407-1410. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.04.027. Epub 2020 May 4.