• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康与基因组学中的数据伦理。

Data Ethics in Digital Health and Genomics.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

New Bioeth. 2021 Dec;27(4):320-333. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2021.1996965. Epub 2021 Nov 7.

DOI:10.1080/20502877.2021.1996965
PMID:34747348
Abstract

The digital revolution has disruptively reshaped the way health services are provided and how research is conducted. This transformation has produced novel ethical challenges. The digitalization of health records, bioinformatics, molecular medicine, wearable biomedical technologies, biotechnology, and synthetic biology has created new biological data niches. How these data are shared, stored, distributed, and analyzed has created ethical problems regarding privacy, trust, accountability, fairness, and justice. This study investigates issues related to data-sharing permissions, fairness in secondary data distribution, and commercial and political conflicts of interest among individuals, companies, and states. In conclusion, establishing an agency to act as deputy trustee on behalf of individuals is recommended to intermediate the complex nature of informed consent. Focusing on decentralized digital technologies is recommended in order to catalyze the utilization of data and prevent discrimination without circulating data unnecessarily.

摘要

数字革命颠覆性地重塑了医疗服务的提供方式和研究的开展方式。这种转变带来了新的伦理挑战。健康记录的数字化、生物信息学、分子医学、可穿戴生物医学技术、生物技术和合成生物学创造了新的生物数据利基。这些数据如何共享、存储、分发和分析,引发了关于隐私、信任、问责制、公平和正义的伦理问题。本研究调查了与数据共享许可、二次数据分配中的公平性以及个人、公司和国家之间的商业和政治利益冲突相关的问题。总之,建议设立一个机构,作为代表个人的副受托人,以调解知情同意的复杂性质。建议专注于分散的数字技术,以促进数据的利用,防止不必要的数据传播造成的歧视。

相似文献

1
Data Ethics in Digital Health and Genomics.数字健康与基因组学中的数据伦理。
New Bioeth. 2021 Dec;27(4):320-333. doi: 10.1080/20502877.2021.1996965. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
2
"I Agree to Disagree": Comparative Ethical and Legal Analysis of Big Data and Genomics for Privacy, Consent, and Ownership.“我同意存在分歧”:大数据与基因组学在隐私、同意和所有权方面的伦理与法律比较分析
Cureus. 2021 Oct 13;13(10):e18736. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18736. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Ethical aspects of digital health from a justice point of view.从公正角度看数字健康的伦理问题。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Oct 1;29(Supplement_3):18-22. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz167.
4
The Ethics of Consent in a Shifting Genomic Ecosystem.在不断变化的基因组生态系统中,同意的伦理问题。
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2021 Jul 20;4:145-164. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-030221-125715.
5
Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) of Responsible Data Sharing Involving Children in Genomics: A Systematic Literature Review of Reasons.负责任的数据共享涉及儿童基因组学的伦理、法律和社会问题(ELSI):原因的系统文献综述
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Oct-Dec;11(4):233-245. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1818875. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices.可穿戴设备用户感知的伦理问题
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):1-28. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9872-8. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
7
Ethical Development of Digital Phenotyping Tools for Mental Health Applications: Delphi Study.数字表型工具在精神健康应用中的伦理发展:德尔菲研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 28;9(7):e27343. doi: 10.2196/27343.
8
Genome Privacy and Trust.基因组隐私与信任。
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2022 Aug 10;5:163-181. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-122120-021311. Epub 2022 May 4.
9
Towards equitable genomics governance in Africa: Guiding principles from theories of global health governance and the African moral theory of Ubuntu.迈向非洲公平的基因组学治理:全球卫生治理理论和非洲乌班图道德理论的指导原则。
Bioethics. 2022 May;36(4):411-422. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12995. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
10
Big Data and Digitalization in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues.大数据与数字化牙科:伦理问题的系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 6;17(7):2495. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072495.

引用本文的文献

1
What are patient perspectives on privacy and trust in digital genomic tools? A qualitative study.患者对数字基因组工具中的隐私和信任有何看法?一项定性研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70025. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70025.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis for a Global Patient co-Owned Cloud (GPOC).全球患者共建云(GPOC)的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nat Commun. 2024 Mar 11;15(1):2186. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46503-5.