Savoye Emilie, Legendre Christophe, Neuzillet Yann, Peraldi Marie-Noëlle, Grimbert Philippe, Ouali Nacera, Durand Matthieu, Badet Lionel, Kerbaul François, Pastural Myriam, Legeai Camille, Macher Marie-Alice, Snanoudj Renaud
Agence de la biomédecine, Direction Prélèvement Greffe Organes-Tissus, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France.
Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Apr 25;37(5):982-990. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab317.
This national multicentre retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of dual kidney transplantation (DKT) and compare them with those obtained from single kidney transplantation (SKT).
Our first analysis concerned all first transplants performed between May 2002 and December 2014, from marginal donors, defined as brain death donors older than 65 years, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) lower than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. The second analysis was restricted to transplants adequately allocated according to the French DKT program based on donor eGFR: DKT for eGFR between 30 and 60, SKT for eGFR between 60 and 90 mL/min/1.73 m2. Recipients younger than 65 years or with a panel-reactive antibody percentage ≥25% were excluded.
The first analysis included 461 DKT and 1131 SKT. DKT donors were significantly older (77.6 versus 74 years), had a more frequent history of hypertension and a lower eGFR (55.1 versus 63.6 mL/min/1.73 m2). While primary nonfunction and delayed graft function did not differ between SKT and DKT, 1-year eGFR was lower in SKT recipients (39 versus 49 mL/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.001). Graft survival was significantly better in DKT, even after adjustment for recipient and donor risk factors. Nevertheless, patient survival did not differ between these groups. The second analysis included 293 DKT and 687 SKT adequately allocated with donor eGFR and displayed similar results but with a smaller benefit in terms of graft survival.
In a context of organ shortage, DKT is a good option for optimizing the use of kidneys from very expanded criteria donors.
这项全国性多中心回顾性队列研究旨在评估双肾移植(DKT)的长期结果,并将其与单肾移植(SKT)的结果进行比较。
我们的首次分析涉及2002年5月至2014年12月期间进行的所有首次移植,供体为边缘供体,定义为年龄超过65岁、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)低于90 mL/min/1.73 m²的脑死亡供体。第二次分析仅限于根据法国DKT计划根据供体eGFR进行适当分配的移植:eGFR在30至60之间进行DKT,eGFR在60至90 mL/min/1.73 m²之间进行SKT。排除年龄小于65岁或群体反应性抗体百分比≥25%的受者。
首次分析包括461例DKT和1131例SKT。DKT供体年龄显著更大(77.6岁对74岁),高血压病史更常见,eGFR更低(55.1 mL/min/1.73 m²对63.6 mL/min/1.73 m²)。虽然SKT和DKT之间原发性无功能和移植肾功能延迟无差异,但SKT受者的1年eGFR更低(39 mL/min/1.73 m²对49 mL/min/1.73 m²,P < 0.001)。即使在调整受者和供体风险因素后,DKT的移植物存活率仍显著更高。然而,这些组之间的患者存活率无差异。第二次分析包括293例DKT和687例根据供体eGFR适当分配的SKT,结果相似,但在移植物存活方面的益处较小。
在器官短缺的情况下,DKT是优化使用来自扩大标准供体肾脏的一个好选择。