School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Melbourne, VIC, 3086, Australia.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Dec;32(4):703-735. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09522-3. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) in older adults has been identified as a risk factor for dementia, although the literature is inconsistent, and it is unclear which factors moderate progression from SCD to dementia. Through separate meta-analyses, we aimed to determine if SCD increased the risk of developing dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Furthermore, we examined several possible moderators. Longitudinal studies of participants with SCD at baseline, with data regarding incident dementia or MCI, were extracted from MEDLINE and PsycINFO. Articles were excluded if SCD occurred solely in the context of dementia, MCI, or as part of a specific disease. Pooled estimates were calculated using a random-effects model, with moderator analyses examining whether risk varied according to SCD definition, demographics, genetics, recruitment source, and follow-up duration. Risk of study bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 tool. 46 studies with more than 74,000 unique participants were included. SCD was associated with increased risk of developing dementia (HR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.52-2.36; OR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.97-3.14) and MCI (HR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.18-2.52; OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.56-2.16). None of the potential moderating factors examined influenced the HR or OR of developing dementia. In contrast, including worry in the definition of SCD, younger age, and recruitment source impacted the OR of developing MCI, with clinic samples demonstrating highest risk. SCD thus represents an at-risk phase, ideal for early intervention, with further research required to identify effective interventions for risk reduction, and cognitive-behavioural interventions for cognitive management. PROSPERO, protocol number: CRD42016037993.
老年人的主观认知衰退(SCD)已被确定为痴呆的危险因素,尽管文献不一致,并且尚不清楚哪些因素可以调节从 SCD 向痴呆的进展。通过单独的荟萃分析,我们旨在确定 SCD 是否会增加发展为痴呆或轻度认知障碍(MCI)的风险。此外,我们还研究了一些可能的调节因素。从 MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO 中提取了基线时有 SCD 的参与者的纵向研究数据,这些参与者有关于痴呆或 MCI 发病的数据。如果 SCD 仅发生在痴呆、MCI 或特定疾病的背景下,则排除文章。使用随机效应模型计算汇总估计值,并进行了调节分析,以检查风险是否根据 SCD 定义、人口统计学、遗传学、招募来源和随访时间而有所不同。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具(QUADAS-2)评估研究偏倚的风险。共有 46 项研究纳入了超过 74000 名独特参与者。SCD 与发展为痴呆的风险增加相关(HR=1.90,95%CI 1.52-2.36;OR=2.48,95%CI 1.97-3.14)和 MCI(HR=1.73,95%CI 1.18-2.52;OR=1.83,95%CI 1.56-2.16)。检查的潜在调节因素均未影响发展为痴呆的 HR 或 OR。相比之下,在 SCD 的定义中包含担忧、年龄较小和招募来源会影响发展为 MCI 的 OR,其中诊所样本风险最高。因此,SCD 代表了一个高风险阶段,非常适合早期干预,需要进一步研究来确定有效的降低风险干预措施和认知行为干预措施来进行认知管理。PROSPERO,方案编号:CRD42016037993。