University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Inst. Franco Granone - Italian Center of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (CIIICS), Turin, Italy.
Am J Clin Hypn. 2022 Aug;64(1):20-35. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2020.1863181.
The history of hypnosis has been marked by its effectiveness paralleled by prejudicial refusal, due to its ostensible incompatibility with the ruling (picture of the world). Its interpretation has been mainly based on concepts like suggestibility, dissociation, hallucination, impairment of sense of agency, and free will. Nevertheless, little evidence and agreement has been reached so far on the nature of hypnosis and hypnotic ability, an uncertainty enhanced by the wide range of meanings and ambiguities of the used terms. This article analyzes the main epistemological implications involved in the topic.
催眠的历史因其看似与主导(世界观)模式不兼容而备受偏见拒绝,但同时又因其有效性而备受关注。其解释主要基于暗示性、分离、幻觉、代理感丧失和自由意志等概念。然而,迄今为止,对于催眠和催眠能力的性质,几乎没有达成共识,而所用术语的广泛含义和歧义则加剧了这种不确定性。本文分析了这一主题所涉及的主要认识论含义。