Suppr超能文献

催眠与催眠能力:新旧证据之间的认识论反思。

Hypnosis and Hypnotic ability between old beliefs and new evidences: An epistemological reflection.

机构信息

University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Inst. Franco Granone - Italian Center of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (CIIICS), Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Clin Hypn. 2022 Aug;64(1):20-35. doi: 10.1080/00029157.2020.1863181.

Abstract

The history of hypnosis has been marked by its effectiveness paralleled by prejudicial refusal, due to its ostensible incompatibility with the ruling (picture of the world). Its interpretation has been mainly based on concepts like suggestibility, dissociation, hallucination, impairment of sense of agency, and free will. Nevertheless, little evidence and agreement has been reached so far on the nature of hypnosis and hypnotic ability, an uncertainty enhanced by the wide range of meanings and ambiguities of the used terms. This article analyzes the main epistemological implications involved in the topic.

摘要

催眠的历史因其看似与主导(世界观)模式不兼容而备受偏见拒绝,但同时又因其有效性而备受关注。其解释主要基于暗示性、分离、幻觉、代理感丧失和自由意志等概念。然而,迄今为止,对于催眠和催眠能力的性质,几乎没有达成共识,而所用术语的广泛含义和歧义则加剧了这种不确定性。本文分析了这一主题所涉及的主要认识论含义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验