Suppr超能文献

被海蛞蝓致敏:Navanax 攻击后,海兔体内的特定部位短期和整体长期致敏。

Sensitized by a sea slug: Site-specific short-term and general long-term sensitization in Aplysia following Navanax attack.

机构信息

Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, United States.

Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, United States.

出版信息

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2022 Jan;187:107542. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107542. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

Abstract

Neurobiological studies of the model species, Aplysia californica (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Euopisthobranchia), have helped advance our knowledge of the neural bases of different forms of learning, including sensitization, a non-associative increase in withdrawal behaviors in response to mild innocuous stimuli. However, our understanding of the natural context for this learning has lagged behind the mechanistic studies. Previous studies, which exclusively used artificial stimuli, such as electric shock, to produce sensitization, left open the question of which stimuli might cause sensitization in nature. Our laboratory first addressed this question by testing for short and long-term sensitization after predatory attack by a natural predator, the spiny lobster. In the present study, we tested for sensitization after attack by a very different predator, the predacious sea-slug, Navanax inermis (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Euopisthobranchia). Unlike the biting and prodding action of lobster attack, Navanax uses a rapid strike that sucks and squeezes its prey in an attempt to swallow it whole. We found that Navanax attack to the head of Aplysia caused strong immediate sensitization of head withdrawal, and weaker, delayed, sensitization of tail-mantle withdrawal. By contrast, attack to the tail of Aplysia resulted in no sensitization of either reflex. We also developed an artificial attack stimulus that allowed us to mimick a more consistently strong attack. This artificial attack produced stronger but qualitatively similar sensitization: Strong immediate sensitization of head withdrawal and weaker sensitization of tail-mantle withdrawal after head attack, immediate sensitization in tail-mantle withdrawal, but no sensitization of head withdrawal after tail attack. We conclude that Navanax attack causes robust site-specific sensitization (enhanced sensitization near the site of attack), and weaker general sensitization (sensitization of responses to stimuli distal to the attack site). We also tested for long-term sensitization (lasting longer than 24 h) after temporally-spaced delivery of four natural Navanax attacks to the head of subject Aplysia. Surprisingly, these head attacks, any one of which strongly sensitizes head withdrawal in the short term, failed to sensitize head-withdrawal in the long term. Paradoxically, these repeated head attacks produced long-term sensitization in tail-mantle withdrawal. These experiments and observations confirm that Navanax attack causes short, and long-term sensitization of withdrawal reflexes of Aplysia. They add site-specific sensitization as well as paradoxical long-term sensitization of tail-mantle withdrawal to a short list of naturally induced learning phenotypes in this model species. Together with previous observations of sensitization after lobster attack, these data strongly support the premise that sensitization in Aplysia is an adaptive response to sub-lethal predator attack.

摘要

神经生物学研究表明,模式生物加利福尼亚海兔(软体动物门腹足纲后鳃亚纲)有助于我们了解不同形式学习的神经基础,包括敏感化,即对轻度无害刺激的退缩行为的非联想性增加。然而,我们对这种学习的自然背景的理解落后于机械研究。以前的研究仅使用电刺激等人工刺激来产生敏感化,这使得一个问题悬而未决,即哪种刺激可能在自然界中引起敏感化。我们实验室首先通过测试捕食性攻击后的短期和长期敏感化来解决这个问题,这种捕食性攻击来自于一种自然捕食者——刺龙虾。在本研究中,我们测试了一种非常不同的捕食者——掠夺性海蛞蝓 Navanax inermis(软体动物门腹足纲后鳃亚纲)攻击后的敏感化。与龙虾攻击的咬和戳动作不同,Navanax 采用快速攻击,通过吸吮和挤压猎物来试图将其整个吞下。我们发现,Navanax 攻击海兔的头部会导致头部退缩的强烈即时敏感化,以及尾部-外套膜退缩的较弱、延迟的敏感化。相比之下,攻击海兔的尾部不会导致任何反射的敏感化。我们还开发了一种人工攻击刺激,使我们能够模拟更一致的强烈攻击。这种人工攻击产生了更强但性质相似的敏感化:头部攻击后的头部退缩立即强烈敏感化,尾部-外套膜退缩的敏感化较弱;而尾部攻击后的头部退缩立即敏感化,头部退缩则无敏感化。我们得出结论,Navanax 攻击会导致强烈的特定部位敏感化(攻击部位附近的增强敏感化)和较弱的一般敏感化(攻击部位以外的刺激反应敏感化)。我们还测试了经过时间间隔的四次天然 Navanax 攻击头部后,海兔的短期和长期敏感化(持续时间超过 24 小时)。令人惊讶的是,这些头部攻击中的任何一次都会在短期内强烈地使头部退缩敏感化,但不会在长期内使头部退缩敏感化。矛盾的是,这些重复的头部攻击会导致尾部-外套膜退缩的长期敏感化。这些实验和观察结果证实,Navanax 攻击会导致海兔的退缩反射产生短期和长期的敏感化。除了该模型物种中自然诱导学习表型的短名单上已经存在的特定部位敏感化外,它们还增加了尾部-外套膜退缩的矛盾的长期敏感化。与以前观察到的龙虾攻击后的敏感化相结合,这些数据强烈支持这样的前提,即海兔的敏感化是对亚致死性捕食者攻击的适应性反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验