Director of the institutional review board and Human Research Protection Program at the University of Utah.
Manager of the institutional review board at the University of Utah.
Ethics Hum Res. 2021 Nov;43(6):42-48. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500109.
In the context of emergency research, researchers can ask the institutional review board (IRB) to waive the regulatory requirement that individuals provide informed consent when enrolling in research studies. A requirement of the waiver of informed consent is that the reviewing IRB must review and approve a community consultation and public disclosure plan. It is critical that an IRB serving as the single IRB (sIRB) for multisite research be thoroughly versed in the local context concerns for each participating site to determine whether the site's community is being adequately consulted about the research in which individuals will be enrolled under an exception to the informed consent requirement. We designed an sIRB review model for evaluating site-specific community consultation plans that included a local evaluation and feedback step, and we piloted the model with a four-site, pediatric exception from informed consent (EFIC) clinical trial. We identified three key roles for the model: the sIRB, the investigators, and the representative of the institution's human research protection program (HRPP). We successfully collected the information and local input needed to evaluate each site's community consultation plan and applied the information to a thorough IRB review, despite the geographic distance between the study site and the sIRB.
在紧急研究的情况下,研究人员可以请求机构审查委员会(IRB)豁免在招募研究参与者时要求个人提供知情同意的监管要求。豁免知情同意的要求之一是,审查的 IRB 必须审查和批准社区咨询和公开披露计划。至关重要的是,作为多地点研究单一 IRB(sIRB)的 IRB 必须深入了解每个参与地点的当地情况,以确定该地点的社区是否正在充分讨论参与者将根据知情同意要求的例外情况参与的研究。我们设计了一种 sIRB 审查模型,用于评估特定地点的社区咨询计划,其中包括当地评估和反馈步骤,并使用一项四地点、儿科豁免知情同意(EFIC)临床试验对该模型进行了试点。我们确定了该模型的三个关键角色:sIRB、研究者和机构人类研究保护计划(HRPP)的代表。我们成功收集了评估每个地点社区咨询计划所需的信息和当地意见,并将这些信息应用于彻底的 IRB 审查,尽管研究地点和 sIRB 之间存在地理距离。