Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, USA.
Med Ref Serv Q. 2021 Oct-Dec;40(4):347-354. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2021.1987771.
Increasingly, a critical eye has been placed on the methodological quality of consensus statements. As expert systematic review (SR) methodologists, librarians are often called on to support consensus statement work. Using the Weill Cornell Medicine Samuel J. Wood Library's SR Service experience as a guide, the aim of this paper is to answer three main questions regarding librarians supporting consensus statement work: (1) What is a consensus statement? (2) What is consensus statement methodology and how does this compare to practice guidelines? (3) What are important and practical points to consider when supporting this kind of request?
越来越多的人开始关注共识声明的方法学质量。作为专家系统评价(SR)方法学家,图书馆员经常被要求为共识声明工作提供支持。本文以韦尔·康奈尔医学院塞缪尔·J·伍德图书馆的 SR 服务经验为指导,旨在回答三个关于图书馆员支持共识声明工作的主要问题:(1)什么是共识声明?(2)共识声明方法学是什么,它与实践指南有何不同?(3)支持此类请求时需要考虑哪些重要且实用的要点?