Suppr超能文献

支持共识声明:系统评价服务的考虑因素和建议。

Supporting Consensus Statements: Considerations and Recommendations for a Systematic Review Service.

机构信息

Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, USA.

出版信息

Med Ref Serv Q. 2021 Oct-Dec;40(4):347-354. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2021.1987771.

Abstract

Increasingly, a critical eye has been placed on the methodological quality of consensus statements. As expert systematic review (SR) methodologists, librarians are often called on to support consensus statement work. Using the Weill Cornell Medicine Samuel J. Wood Library's SR Service experience as a guide, the aim of this paper is to answer three main questions regarding librarians supporting consensus statement work: (1) What is a consensus statement? (2) What is consensus statement methodology and how does this compare to practice guidelines? (3) What are important and practical points to consider when supporting this kind of request?

摘要

越来越多的人开始关注共识声明的方法学质量。作为专家系统评价(SR)方法学家,图书馆员经常被要求为共识声明工作提供支持。本文以韦尔·康奈尔医学院塞缪尔·J·伍德图书馆的 SR 服务经验为指导,旨在回答三个关于图书馆员支持共识声明工作的主要问题:(1)什么是共识声明?(2)共识声明方法学是什么,它与实践指南有何不同?(3)支持此类请求时需要考虑哪些重要且实用的要点?

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验