Suppr超能文献

标准化新生儿脑病检查标准的差异可能会影响亚低温治疗的适应证。

Differences in standardized neonatal encephalopathy exam criteria may impact therapeutic hypothermia eligibility.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Res. 2022 Sep;92(3):791-798. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01834-7. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is routinely provided to those with moderate or severe neonatal encephalopathy (NE). Subtle differences exist in the standardized exams used to define NE severity. We aimed to assess if an infant's TH eligibility status differed if they were evaluated using either the NICHD/Neonatal Research Network's (NICHD-NRN) or TOBY/British Association of Perinatal Medicine's (TOBY-BAPM) neurological exam.

METHODS

Encephalopathic infants ≥36 weeks with evidence of perinatal asphyxia and complete documentation of the neurological exam <6 h of age were included. TH eligibility using the NICHD-NRN and TOBY-BAPM criteria was determined based upon the documented exams.

RESULTS

Ninety-one encephalopathic infants were included. Despite good agreement between the two exams (κ = 0.715, p < 0.001), TH eligibility differed between them (p < 0.001). A total of 47 infants were deemed eligible by at least one method-46 using NICHD-NRN and 35 using TOBY-BAPM. Of the 12 infants eligible per NICHD-NRN, but ineligible per TOBY-BAPM, two developed electrographic seizures and seven demonstrated hypoxic-ischemic cerebral injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the NICHD-NRN and TOBY-BAPM exams are evidence-based. Despite this, there is a significant difference in the number of infants eligible for TH depending on which exam is used. The NICHD-NRN exam identifies a greater proportion as eligible.

IMPACT

There are subtle differences in the NICHD-NRN and TOBY-BAPM's encephalopathy exams used to determine eligibility for TH. This results in a significant difference in the proportion of infants determined to be eligible for TH depending on which encephalopathy exam is used. The NICHD-NRN encephalopathy exam identifies more infants as being eligible for TH than the TOBY-BAPM encephalopathy exam. This may result in different rates of cooling depending on which evidence-based neurological exam for evaluation of encephalopathy a center uses.

摘要

背景

中重度新生儿脑病(NE)患者常规接受治疗性低温(TH)治疗。用于定义 NE 严重程度的标准化检查存在细微差异。我们旨在评估如果使用国立卫生研究院/新生儿研究网络(NICHD-NRN)或 TOBY/英国围产医学协会(TOBY-BAPM)神经检查评估婴儿,其 TH 资格状态是否不同。

方法

纳入胎龄≥36 周、有围生期窒息证据且神经检查记录完整且年龄<6 小时的脑病婴儿。根据记录的检查结果,使用 NICHD-NRN 和 TOBY-BAPM 标准确定 TH 资格。

结果

共纳入 91 例脑病婴儿。尽管两种检查之间具有良好的一致性(κ=0.715,p<0.001),但它们之间的 TH 资格不同(p<0.001)。至少有一种方法确定 47 例婴儿符合 TH 资格标准-46 例符合 NICHD-NRN,35 例符合 TOBY-BAPM。在符合 NICHD-NRN 标准但不符合 TOBY-BAPM 标准的 12 例婴儿中,有 2 例发生了脑电图癫痫发作,7 例出现了缺氧缺血性脑损伤。

结论

NICHD-NRN 和 TOBY-BAPM 检查均基于证据。尽管如此,根据所使用的检查,有 TH 资格的婴儿数量存在显著差异。NICHD-NRN 检查确定的合格婴儿比例更高。

影响

用于确定 TH 资格的 NICHD-NRN 和 TOBY-BAPM 脑病检查存在细微差异。这导致根据所使用的脑病检查,确定有资格接受 TH 的婴儿比例存在显著差异。NICHD-NRN 脑病检查确定的有 TH 资格的婴儿比 TOBY-BAPM 脑病检查多。这可能导致根据中心用于评估脑病的基于证据的神经检查的不同,冷却的比率不同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验