Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Can J Public Health. 2022 Apr;113(2):297-311. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
To synthesize and appraise economic evaluations of vision screening to detect vision impairment in children.
Literature searches were conducted on seven electronic databases, grey literature, and websites of agencies conducting health technology assessments. Studies were included if they (1) were full, comparative economic evaluations that used cost-utility, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-consequence, or cost-analysis methods; (2) described screening services designed to detect amblyopia, strabismus, or uncorrected refractive errors in children under 6 years of age; and (3) published after 1994. High-quality studies were synthesized descriptively. Currencies were reported in 2019 Canadian dollars. Quality was assessed with the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ).
Vision screening services were conducted by paid staff, volunteers, or health care professionals in schools or clinics. Thirteen studies were published from five countries: China (n = 1), United States (n = 4), United Kingdom (n = 1), Canada (n = 1), and Germany (n = 6). Analytical techniques included cost-utility/cost-effectiveness combination (n = 2), cost-effectiveness analysis (n = 7), cost-utility analysis (n = 1), cost-benefit analysis (n = 1), cost-consequence analysis (n = 1), and cost analysis (n = 1). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from C$1,056 to C$151,274 per additional case detected/prevented and from C$9,429 to C$30,254,703 per additional QALY gained, depending on the type of screening service and comparator. Six studies were determined to be of high quality.
Vision screening to detect amblyopia for young children may be cost-effective compared with no screening if amblyopia reduced quality of life. Studies varied significantly in the type of screening services and comparators used. Methodological limitations were common. Future studies would be aided immensely by prospective studies on the impact of amblyopia on the health-related quality of life of young children and guidelines on the effective conduct of vision screening.
综合评价儿童视力筛查以检测视力损害的经济评估。
在七个电子数据库、灰色文献和进行卫生技术评估的机构网站上进行了文献检索。如果研究(1)是使用成本效用、成本效益、成本效果、成本后果或成本分析方法的完整、比较性经济评估;(2)描述旨在检测 6 岁以下儿童弱视、斜视或未经矫正屈光不正的筛查服务;(3)发表于 1994 年后,则纳入研究。高质量研究进行描述性综合。货币以 2019 年加拿大元报告。质量使用儿科质量评估问卷(PQAQ)进行评估。
视力筛查服务由学校或诊所的付费工作人员、志愿者或医疗保健专业人员进行。13 项研究来自五个国家:中国(n=1)、美国(n=4)、英国(n=1)、加拿大(n=1)和德国(n=6)。分析技术包括成本效用/成本效果组合(n=2)、成本效果分析(n=7)、成本效用分析(n=1)、成本效益分析(n=1)、成本后果分析(n=1)和成本分析(n=1)。增量成本效果比从每例额外检出/预防病例增加的 C$1,056 至 C$151,274 不等,从每例额外获得的 QALY 增加的 C$9,429 至 C$30,254,703 不等,具体取决于筛查服务和对照的类型。六项研究被认为质量较高。
与不筛查相比,筛查儿童弱视可能具有成本效益,如果弱视降低了生活质量。研究在使用的筛查服务和对照方面差异很大。方法学局限性很常见。如果有前瞻性研究弱视对幼儿健康相关生活质量的影响以及有关有效进行视力筛查的指南,将极大地有助于未来的研究。