Resident of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt; M.Sc. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan;50(1):61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.09.014. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
To compare clinically and radiographically between the 3-D plates and the conventional two Champy's miniplates in the treatment of anterior mandibular fractures. It is a randomized clinical and radiographic comparative study between 2 equal groups of patients with isolated anterior mandibular fractures. Open reduction and internal rigid fixation was accomplished in the study group using 3D miniplates fixation while in the control group using the two Champy's miniplates. The 3D miniplate osteosynthesis consumed less operative time than the two miniplates osteosynthesis. Independent t-test revealed that the difference between the 2 groups was 8.4 ± 3.11 min. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.012). Occlusion was slightly disturbed in two patients in the study group in comparison to three patients in the control group. The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p=0.62). None of the cases of both groups showed mobility between the reduced and fixed fractured segments, immediately post-operatively and at the end of follow-up intervals. The 3D miniplate osteosynthesis (study group) recorded less intercondylar distance than two miniplates osteosynthesis (control group) immediately post-operatively and after 3 months. Independent t-test revealed that the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant, immediately postoperative (p=0.322) and after 3 months (p=0.263). Pre-operatively to 3 months postoperatively, the 3D miniplate osteosynthesis (study group) recorded a lower median percent increase in the intercondylar distance than the two miniplates osteosynthesis (control group). The difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (p=0.917). Regarding the intercondylar angle, the3D miniplate osteosynthesis (study group) recorded higher intercondylar angle than the two miniplates osteosynthesis (control group) immediately post-operative (p=0.333) and after 3 months (p=0.255). Independent t-test revealed that the difference between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. The 3-Dimensional strut miniplates should be considered an alternative for internal rigid fixation of anterior mandibular fractures for their ease of adaptation and insertion, while providing the advantage of reduced operative time compared to the conventional two Champy's miniplates.
比较 3D 钢板与传统双 Champy 微型板治疗下颌前骨折的临床和影像学差异。这是一项比较两组下颌前骨折患者的随机临床和影像学研究。研究组采用 3D 微型板固定,对照组采用双 Champy 微型板固定。3D 微型板骨合成的手术时间比双微型板骨合成的手术时间短。独立 t 检验显示,两组之间的差异为 8.4±3.11 分钟。这种差异具有统计学意义(p=0.012)。与对照组的 3 例患者相比,研究组有 2 例患者的咬合略有干扰,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.62)。两组病例术后即刻及随访结束时均未出现固定骨折段之间的活动。术后即刻及 3 个月时,3D 微型板骨合成(研究组)的髁间距离小于双微型板骨合成(对照组)。独立 t 检验显示,两组之间的差异无统计学意义,术后即刻(p=0.322)和 3 个月后(p=0.263)。术前至术后 3 个月,3D 微型板骨合成(研究组)的髁间距离中位数百分比增加低于双微型板骨合成(对照组)。两组之间的差异无统计学意义(p=0.917)。髁间角方面,3D 微型板骨合成(研究组)术后即刻和 3 个月后髁间角高于双微型板骨合成(对照组)(p=0.333 和 p=0.255)。独立 t 检验显示,两组之间的差异无统计学意义。3D 支撑微型板可作为下颌前骨折内固定的替代方法,其易于适应和插入,与传统的双 Champy 微型板相比,手术时间更短。