Effects of a ceramic active self-ligating bracket on retraction/tipping/ rotation of canine, premolar mesialization, and transverse arch dimensions: A preliminary single-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND

There is no clinical study on ceramic self-ligating brackets (SLBs). Therefore, this preliminary study was conducted for the first time to address its effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This split-mouth randomized trial was performed on 32 quadrants in 16 orthodontic patients needing extraction of maxillary premolars and distalization of canines. In each blinded patient, right/left sides were randomized into control (ceramic bracket) and experimental (ceramic SLB) groups. Dental stone models were taken before canine retraction and 3 months into retraction. Models were digitized as three-dimensional models. Changes were measured on superimposed models. Groups were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α = 0.05, β = 0.1).

RESULTS

Both bracket types caused significant changes after 3 months in terms of all assessed clinical outcomes ( ≤ 0.002). Compared to conventional ceramic brackets (control), ceramic SLBs reduced retraction rate ( = 0.001), canine rotation ( = 0.001), canine tipping ( = 0.002), and arch expansion at the canine site ( = 0.003). However, the extents of anchorage loss ( = 0.796) and arch constriction in the premolar area ( = 0.605) were not statistically different between the bracket types.

CONCLUSION

Compared to conventional metal-lined ceramic brackets, active ceramic SLB can increase the duration of canine distalization, while reducing canine rotation and tipping (inducing more bodily movements). The loss of anchorage with ceramic SLB was similar to that of conventional ceramic bracket after 3 months of treatment (considering the lower rate of SLB canine retraction during that time). Both brackets similarly constricted the arch at the premolar site. In the canine area, they expanded the arch, with the SLB causing smaller extents of expansion.