Sevelda P, Haider F, Spona J
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1987 Jul;47(7):452-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035850.
Aim of this prospective study was to examine the value of the "Immunosuppressive Acidic Protein" (IAP) as a tumour marker for epithelial ovarian carcinomas and to compare the results with these of the established tumour marker CA-125. In 75 patients with malignant ovarian tumours and in 36 patients with benign ovarian tumours and in 68 healthy women the serum IAP and CA-125 values were determined. In dependence of the threshold for the IAP (500 or 800 microgram/ml) a pronounced lower specificity (70.2% or 97.1%) or sensitivity (88% or 40%) could be achieved in comparison with the CA-125 (95.2% specificity and 81.3% sensitivity). In only 4% of all ovarian carcinomas the CA-125 was false negative and the IAP right positive. Whereas the serum CA-125 level correlated in 86.9% of the patients with the clinical course of disease, the serum IAP level correlated only in 43.3% of the patients with their clinical course of disease. We therefore concluded, that the IAP is less suitable as a tumour marker in ovarian carcinomas than the CA-125 and even the combination of both markers is only beneficial for a very small number of patients.
这项前瞻性研究的目的是检验“免疫抑制酸性蛋白”(IAP)作为上皮性卵巢癌肿瘤标志物的价值,并将结果与已确立的肿瘤标志物CA - 125的结果进行比较。测定了75例恶性卵巢肿瘤患者、36例良性卵巢肿瘤患者和68例健康女性的血清IAP和CA - 125值。与CA - 125(特异性95.2%,敏感性81.3%)相比,根据IAP的阈值(500或800微克/毫升),可以实现明显较低的特异性(70.2%或97.1%)或敏感性(88%或40%)。在所有卵巢癌中,只有4%的患者CA - 125呈假阴性而IAP呈真阳性。血清CA - 125水平在86.9%的患者中与疾病临床进程相关,而血清IAP水平仅在43.3%的患者中与疾病临床进程相关。因此,我们得出结论,与CA - 125相比,IAP作为卵巢癌肿瘤标志物不太合适,甚至两种标志物联合使用也仅对极少数患者有益。