Gynaecological Oncology, University of Manchester Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.
Biomedical Informatics and Medical Statistics Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e054004. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054004.
There is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy for people with advanced endometrial cancer. Neoadjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been employed to try to reduce the morbidity of surgery, improve its feasibility and/or improve functional performance in people considered unfit for primary surgery. The objective of this review is to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy improves health outcomes in people with advanced endometrial cancer when compared with upfront surgery.
This review will consider both randomised and non-randomised studies that compare health outcomes associated with the neoadjuvant therapy and upfront surgery in advanced endometrial cancer. Potential studies for inclusion will be collated from electronic searches of OVID Medline, Embase, international trial registries and conference abstract lists. Data collection and extraction will be performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tools. If appropriate, we will perform a meta-analysis and provide summary statistics for each outcome.
Ethics approval was not required for this study. Once complete, we will publish our findings in peer-reviewed publications, via conference presentations and to update relevant practice guidelines.
对于晚期子宫内膜癌患者,尚无最佳治疗策略的共识。新辅助治疗,如化疗和放疗,已被用于尝试降低手术的发病率,提高其可行性,并/或改善被认为不适合进行初始手术的患者的功能表现。本综述的目的是评估与初始手术相比,新辅助化疗或放疗是否能改善晚期子宫内膜癌患者的健康结局。
本综述将考虑比较新辅助治疗与晚期子宫内膜癌初始手术相关健康结局的随机和非随机研究。潜在的纳入研究将从 OVID Medline、Embase、国际试验注册处和会议摘要列表中进行电子检索进行收集。数据收集和提取将按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目进行。研究的方法学质量将使用偏倚风险 2 和干预措施的非随机研究偏倚风险工具进行评估。如果合适,我们将进行荟萃分析,并为每个结局提供汇总统计数据。
本研究不需要伦理批准。完成后,我们将在同行评议的出版物、会议演示以及更新相关实践指南中发布我们的研究结果。