Halabi Susan, Yang Qian, Carmack Andrea, Zhang Shiqi, Foo Wen-Chi, Eisen Tim, Stadler Walter M, Jones Robert J, Garcia Jorge A, Vaishampayan Ulka N, Picus Joel, Hawkins Robert E, Hainsworth John D, Kollmannsberger Christian K, Logan Theodore F, Puzanov Igor, Pickering Lisa M, Ryan Christopher W, Protheroe Andrew, George Daniel J, Armstrong Andrew J
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham NC.
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Kidney Cancer J. 2021 Oct;19(3):64-72. doi: 10.52733/kcj19n3-a1.
Biomarkers are needed in patients with non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (NC-RCC), particularly papillary renal cell carcinoma, in order to inform on initial treatment selection and identify potentially novel targets for therapy. We enrolled 108 patients in ASPEN, an international randomized open-label phase 2 trial of patients with metastatic papillary, chromophobe, or unclassified NC-RCC treated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (n=57) or the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitor sunitinib (n=51), stratified by MSKCC risk and histology. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary efficacy endpoints for this exploratory biomarker analysis were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) defined by intention-to-treat using the RECIST 1.1 criteria and radiographic response rates. Tissue biomarkers (n=78) of mTOR pathway activation (phospho-S6 and -Akt, c-kit) and VEGF pathway activation (HIF-1α, c-MET) were prospectively explored in tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry prior to treatment and associated with clinical outcomes. We found that S6 activation was more common in poor risk NC-RCC tumors and S6/Akt activation was associated with worse PFS and OS outcomes with both everolimus and sunitinib, while c-kit was commonly expressed in chromophobe tumors and associated with improved outcomes with both agents. C-MET was commonly expressed in papillary tumors and was associated with lower rates of radiographic response but did not predict PFS for either agent. In multivariable analysis, both pAkt and c-kit were statistically significant prognostic biomarkers of OS. No predictive biomarkers of treatment response were identified for clinical outcomes. Most biomarker subgroups had improved outcomes with sunitinib as compared to everolimus.
对于非透明细胞肾细胞癌(NC-RCC)患者,尤其是乳头状肾细胞癌患者,需要生物标志物来指导初始治疗选择并识别潜在的新治疗靶点。我们在ASPEN研究中纳入了108例患者,这是一项针对转移性乳头状、嫌色性或未分类NC-RCC患者的国际随机开放标签2期试验,患者接受mTOR抑制剂依维莫司(n = 57)或血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)受体抑制剂舒尼替尼(n = 51)治疗,按MSKCC风险和组织学分层。主要终点是总生存期(OS),该探索性生物标志物分析的次要疗效终点是根据RECIST 1.1标准采用意向性治疗定义的影像学无进展生存期(rPFS)和影像学缓解率。在治疗前通过免疫组织化学对肿瘤组织中mTOR通路激活(磷酸化S6和-Akt、c-kit)和VEGF通路激活(HIF-1α、c-MET)的组织生物标志物(n = 78)进行前瞻性探索,并与临床结局相关联。我们发现,S6激活在低风险NC-RCC肿瘤中更常见,S6/Akt激活与依维莫司和舒尼替尼治疗的较差PFS和OS结局相关,而c-kit在嫌色性肿瘤中普遍表达,且与两种药物治疗的较好结局相关。C-MET在乳头状肿瘤中普遍表达,与影像学缓解率较低相关,但不能预测任何一种药物的PFS。在多变量分析中,pAkt和c-kit均为OS的统计学显著预后生物标志物。未识别出针对临床结局的治疗反应预测生物标志物。与依维莫司相比,大多数生物标志物亚组使用舒尼替尼的结局更好。